...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Differences in viral kinetics between genotypes 1 and 3 of hepatitis C virus and between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients during antiviral therapy.
【24h】

Differences in viral kinetics between genotypes 1 and 3 of hepatitis C virus and between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients during antiviral therapy.

机译:抗病毒治疗期间,丙型肝炎病毒基因型1和3之间以及肝硬化和非肝硬化患者之间的病毒动力学差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with genotype 1 or 3 and the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis (LC) in the early viral kinetics response to treatment. METHODS: Naive patients (n = 46) treated with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin and followed up with frequent early HCV-RNA determinations were analysed. Patients were infected with genotype 1 (n = 28, 7 with LC) or 3 (n = 18, 5 with LC). RESULTS: The first phase decline was larger in genotype 3 patients than in genotype 1 patients (1.72 vs 0.95 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). The second phase slope decline was also larger in genotype 3 patients than in genotype 1 patients (0.87 vs 0.15 log/wk, P < 0.001). Differences were found in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Genotype 1 cirrhotic patients had a slower 2nd phase slope than non-cirrhotic patients (0.06 vs 0.18 log/wk, P < 0.02). None of genotype 1 cirrhotic patients had a 1st phase decline larger than 1 log (non-cirrhotic patients: 55%, P < 0.02). A similar trend toward a slower 2nd phase slope was observed in genotype 3 cirrhotic patients but the 1st phase slope decline was not different. Sustained viral response was higher in genotype 3 patients than in genotype 1 patients (72% vs 14%, P < 0.001) and in genotype 1 non-cirrhotic patients than in genotype 1 cirrhotic patients (19% vs 0%). A second phase decline slower than 0.3 log/wk was predictive of non-response in all groups. CONCLUSION: Genotype 3 has faster early viral decline than genotype 1. Cirrhosis correlates with a slower 2nd phase decline and possibly with a lower 1st phase slope decline in genotype 1 patients.
机译:目的:评估基因型1或3的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染以及是否存在肝硬化(LC)在对治疗的早期病毒动力学反应中的影响。方法:分析了接受干扰素-α(IFN-α)和利巴韦林治疗的幼稚患者(n = 46),并随访了早期的频繁HCV-RNA测定。患者感染了基因型1(LC,n = 28、7)或基因型3(LC,n = 18,5)。结果:基因型3的患者的第一阶段下降大于基因型1的患者(1.72 vs 0.95 log IU / mL,P <0.001)。基因型3的患者的第二阶段斜率下降也比基因型1的患者更大(0.87 vs 0.15 log / wk,P <0.001)。在肝硬化和非肝硬化患者中均发现差异。基因型1的肝硬化患者的第二阶段斜率比非肝硬化的患者慢(0.06 vs 0.18 log / wk,P <0.02)。基因型1的肝硬化患者的第一阶段下降均未超过1 log(非肝硬化的患者:55%,P <0.02)。在基因型3的肝硬化患者中,观察到类似的趋势,即第二相的斜率变慢,但第一相的斜率下降没有差异。基因型3的患者的持续病毒应答高于基因型1的患者(72%比14%,P <0.001)和基因型1的非肝硬化患者比基因型1的肝硬化患者(19%比0%)更高。低于0.3 log / wk的第二阶段下降预示所有组中无反应。结论:基因型3的早期病毒下降比基因型1的快。肝硬化与基因型1的患者的第二阶段下降较慢,可能与第一阶段斜率下降较低有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号