首页> 外文期刊>Built environment >Planning Policy, Sustainable Drainage and Surface Water Management A Case Study of Greater Manchester
【24h】

Planning Policy, Sustainable Drainage and Surface Water Management A Case Study of Greater Manchester

机译:规划政策,可持续排水和地表水管理-以大曼彻斯特为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As the differing sources of flood events are being more widely understood, the risk of surface water is being identified as an emerging threat for the twenty-first century. The difficulties in accurately predicting and managing the flow of water across highly urbanized catchments has led to a more sustainable and precautionary approach being advocated, focused on the localized storage and infiltration of precipitation. Within England the use of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) has been identified as a key strand of this management challenge, with the role of spatial planning being highlighted as the main mechanism for implementation. The last decade has seen a growing SuDS planning national and local policy framework established, yet evidence would suggest that despite being enshrined in planning policy there are still few SuDS sites in operation. This research uses a case study of ten local authorities and compares the spatial distribution of SuDS sites with an analysis of the strength of the relevant local planning policy framework. Despite the pivotal role of planning in new development, it is found that there is currently no correlation between the strength of a planning policy and the use of SuDS, mainly due to the existence of wider, significant barriers affecting the development process prior to a planning application. Furthermore, the strength of policy was also said to be much less significant than the role of motivated individuals and innovative sustainability policies.
机译:随着越来越多的洪水事件来源得到人们的理解,地表水的风险被确定为二十一世纪的新兴威胁。在准确预测和管理高度城市化集水区的水流方面的困难导致人们提倡一种更具可持续性和预防性的方法,重点是降水的局部存储和渗透。在英格兰内部,可持续城市排水系统(SuDS)的使用已被确定为管理挑战的关键所在,空间规划的作用被强调为主要的实施机制。在过去的十年中,建立了不断增长的SuDS规划国家和地方政策框架,但是有证据表明,尽管SuDS规划已被纳入规划政策中,但仍有很少的SuDS站点在运营。这项研究使用了十个地方政府的案例研究,并将SuDS站点的空间分布与相关地方规划政策框架的实力进行了比较。尽管规划在新开发中起着举足轻重的作用,但目前发现,规划政策的实力与SuDS的使用之间没有关联,这主要是由于在规划之前存在更广泛的重大障碍影响了开发过程应用。此外,据称政策的力量远不如积极进取的个人和创新的可持续发展政策的作用重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号