首页> 外文期刊>Building >INBOX CALL IN THE EXPERTS
【24h】

INBOX CALL IN THE EXPERTS

机译:专家的收件箱通话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

QSs fight back I am writing with regard to Sir Michael Latham's article on cost consultants (21 April, page 24). To suggest that the QS profession "whisper[s] in the client's ear, 'take the lowest bid,'" is not only a very sweeping statement but also it demonstrates a lack of understanding about the job that we do. Undoubtedly he has done some sterling stuff in his time but this kind of inflammatory rhetoric is undeserved and frankly wrong. Not all QS firms recommend the lowest tender on price alone, as first past the post is not always right. At Robinson Low Francis we focus on out-turn cost. Of course, much depends on the quality of information on which the tenders are based. If there has been sufficient time to develop a brief and then design the scheme, having taken into account option studies for the client's benefit and a proper period for the tendering process, then we will take a view on the tender returns alongside the team being put forward in terms of experience and suitability together with knowledge of the contractor's supply chain.
机译:QS可以反击,我正在就Michael Latham爵士关于成本顾问的文章(4月21日,第24页)进行写作。提出QS专业“在客户的耳边低语,'以最低的出价'”不仅是一个非常笼统的陈述,而且还表明对我们所做的工作缺乏了解。毫无疑问,他在那段时间里做过一些英镑的事情,但是这种煽动性的言论是不应该的,并且坦率地说是错误的。并非所有QS公司都建议仅凭价格标出最低价,因为过去的职位并不总是正确的。在Robinson Low Francis,我们专注于周转成本。当然,很大程度上取决于招标所依据的信息质量。如果有足够的时间来制定简要的方案,然后设计方案,并考虑到为客户的利益而进行的期权研究以及招标过程的适当期限,那么我们将与团队一起考虑招标收益在经验和适用性方面以及承包商的供应链知识方面不断前进。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2011年第20期|p.27|共1页
  • 作者

    Mark Owen via;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:35:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号