Dear me, said the responding party (main contractor) to the adjudicator, none of this will do - the referring party has gone wrong in describing what the contract is. The subcontractor is attempting to argue the rights and wrongs under the wrong contract. And since you, Mr Adjudicator, are to decide the dispute under the contract, it is all a waste of time if you proceed under the wrong contract. This is more or less what happened in a very recent case called RMP Construction Services Ltd vs Chalcroft Ltd. The adjudicator said "tish-tosh", I am pressing on. He eventually awarded £259,000 to the ground worker subby (RMP). Chalcroft said "tish-tosh" to RMP, and said they could whistle for the cash. They did whistle, and came to the High Court to enforce the adjudicator's order to pay up.
展开▼
机译：亲爱的我，裁决者的响应方（总承包商）说，这无能为力-推荐方在描述合同内容时出了错。分包商试图根据错误的合同辩护是非。而且，由于您（仲裁员）将根据合同决定争议，因此，如果您根据错误的合同进行诉讼，则完全是在浪费时间。这或多或少是在最近的一个案件中发生的，该案件称为RMP Construction Services Ltd与ChalcroftLtd。审裁官说：“提什-陶什”，我正在强调。最终，他将259,000英镑的奖金授予了地勤工作者（RMP）。查尔克罗夫特对皇家骑警表示“提什”，并表示他们可以要求现金。他们吹口哨，并来到高等法院执行判决人的还款命令。
展开▼
