MG Construction Ltd vs AGD Equipment Ltd 120201 ScotCS CSOH 72 Opinion of Lord Ericht In the Outer House, Court of Sessions Opinion delivered 14 July 2020 During July 2014 MGC purchased a piling rig from AGD consisting of an impact hammer and a piece of equipment known as the "leader" which acted as a guide for the hammer and maintained vertically during piling. In May 2015 MGC's foreman noticed a paintwork blemish on part of the leader known as the "ram box" and asked MGC fitter Mr Jack to carry out an inspection. Mr Jack produced a report dated 12 May stating, "Noticed small crack in paintwork on side shift ram box section. Applied weld to crack for visual check."
展开▼
机译：MG Construction Ltd vs Agd Equipment Ltd 120201 Scotcs CSOH 72埃希勋爵在外部屋中的意见，会议舆论法院于2014年7月14日举行，MGC从AGD购买了一个由撞击锤组成的打桩钻井平台和一块已知的设备作为锤子的指导并在打桩期间垂直维持的“领导者”。 2015年5月，MGC的工头在称为“Ram Box”的领导者的一部分，并要求MGC Fitter Mr杰克进行检查。杰克先生制作了一份报告日期为12月12日陈述，“在侧换流框部分上的涂料中注意到的小裂缝。应用焊缝裂缝用于视觉检查。”
展开▼
