【24h】

DUTY CALLS

机译:责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A s is well known, a professional such as an engineer or architect can owe a duty of care in tort (that is, not based upon a contractual relationship) to a third party. The precise circumstances in which such a duty of care arises are obviously heavily fact-specific, but some general guidelines have been established in a number of legal cases. What is the position, however, if the third party who relies on the work supplied by the professional does not in fact exist at the time the work was supplied? This interesting issue, and a review of the principles establishing the existence of a duty of care in these circumstances, was recently considered in Valley Brook Investments Ltd and Another vs Huam Ltd [2020] EWHC.
机译:众所周知,一个专业人员或建筑师的专业人士可以遵守侵权义务(即不是基于合同关系)到第三方。这种护理责任的确切情况显然是严重的事实特异性,但一些一般指导方针已经在一些法律案件中建立。但是,如果依赖于专业人员提供的工作的第三方实际上不存在该工作时的第三方是否存在?这一有趣的问题,以及审查了在谷布鲁克投资有限公司和其他vs欢呼有限公司中审议了在这些情况下建立了关怀义务存在的原则。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2020年第17期|44-45|共2页
  • 作者

    Simon Lewis;

  • 作者单位

    Womble Bond Dickinson (UK);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号