首页> 外文期刊>Building >Taking a knife to adjudicators' decisions
【24h】

Taking a knife to adjudicators' decisions

机译:用小刀审裁官的决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Corebuild, the Court held that the adjudicator had gone off on a "frolic of his own" rendering his decision unenforceable because he had breached the rules of natural justice. Corebuild demonstrates that while the Court will enforce an adjudicator's decision if he or she gets the answer to the question wrong, it will refuse to enforce if he or she answers the wrong question entirely. The Employers, Mr Cleaver and Ms Omolska, engaged Corebuild Limited to carry out works to a residential property. The Employers, via the Contract Administrator, had served the Contractor with notice that they would terminate the contract in 14 days if it continued to fail to progress the works regularly and diligently. When in the Contract Administrator's view the situation did not improve, he served a further notice after the expiry of the 14-day period purporting to terminate the contract.
机译:在Corebuild中,法院裁定,审裁官因“违反了自己的要求”而离开法庭,致使他的决定无法执行,因为他违反了自然公正规则。 Corebuild证明,尽管法院如果对判决人的回答是错误的,将执行判决人的决定,但如果法院完全回答错误的问题,法院将拒绝执行。雇主Cleaver先生和Omolska女士委托Corebuild Limited对一处住宅物业进行工程。雇主通过合同管理人已向承包商发出通知,通知他们如果合同未能继续定期和勤奋地继续进行,他们将在14天内终止合同。如果合同管理员认为情况没有改善,则在14天期限到期后(旨在终止合同)他进一步发出了通知。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2019年第43appa期|19-20|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:18:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号