...
首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Life cycle assessment for three ventilation methods
【24h】

Life cycle assessment for three ventilation methods

机译:三种通风方法的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A sustainable ventilation method is one of the possible solutions to mitigate climate change and carbon emission. This method shall involve an analysis of the environmental impact, energy performance, and economical cost-effectiveness. There are still few studies concerning the life cycle assessment (LCA) of various alternative ventilation systems incorporating the combined effect of life cycle cost (LCC) and carbon emission in the supply-and-installation phase, as well as energy performances in the operation phase. The supply-and-installation phase of the system materials and components has a significant contribution to the total energy consumption and environmental loads of buildings. This paper covers a systematic approach to estimate their environmental impact, which has been counted in terms of energy demand and CO2 emission in the two phases. This approach has been applied to an actual typical classroom served by mixing ventilation (MV), displacement ventilation (DV) and stratum ventilation (SV). The results show that SV has the least environmental impact and life cycle cost (LCC). Results of this analysis demonstrated that by adopting DV and SV, it is possible to reduce the CO2 emission up to 23.25% and 31.71% respectively; and to reduce the LCC up to 15.52% and 23.89% respectively, in comparison with an MV system for 20 service years. This approach may be generally applied to a sustainability analysis of ventilation methods in various scales of air-conditioned spaces. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:可持续的通风方法是减轻气候变化和碳排放的可能解决方案之一。该方法应包括对环境影响,能源绩效和经济成本效益的分析。关于各种替代通风系统的生命周期评估(LCA)的研究仍然很少,其中考虑了在供应和安装阶段的生命周期成本(LCC)和碳排放以及运营阶段的能源绩效的综合影响。系统材料和组件的供应和安装阶段对建筑物的总能耗和环境负荷有重大贡献。本文涵盖了一种系统的方法来估算其对环境的影响,这已在两个阶段的能源需求和二氧化碳排放量中进行了计算。此方法已应用于混合通风(MV),置换通风(DV)和地层通风(SV)服务的实际典型教室。结果表明,SV具有最小的环境影响和生命周期成本(LCC)。分析结果表明,采用DV和SV可以将CO2排放量分别减少23.25%和31.71%。与MV系统相比,在20个服务年中,LCC分别降低了15.52%和23.89%。该方法通常可应用于各种规模的空调空间中通风方法的可持续性分析。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building and Environment》 |2017年第5期|73-88|共16页
  • 作者单位

    City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Bldg Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;

    City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Bldg Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;

    City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Bldg Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;

    Univ Loughborough, Sch Civil & Bldg Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England;

    De Montfort Univ, Fac Technol, Inst Energy & Sustainable Dev, Leicester, Leics, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    LCA; LCC; CO2; Mixing ventilation; Displacement ventilation; Stratum ventilation;

    机译:LCA;LCC;CO2;混合通风;置换通风;基础通风;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号