首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Purifier or fresh air unit? A study on indoor paniculate matter purification strategies for buildings with split air-conditioners
【24h】

Purifier or fresh air unit? A study on indoor paniculate matter purification strategies for buildings with split air-conditioners

机译:净化器还是新鲜空气装置?分体式空调建筑物室内颗粒物净化策略研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Buildings with split air-conditioners (referred to as SAC buildings) are not equipped with mechanical ventilation systems. The fresh air supply in these buildings primarily relies on natural ventilation and air infiltration, both of which can introduce outdoor particulate matter (PM) pollutants into the indoor environment. To simultaneously satisfy fresh air and indoor PM concentration requirements, two indoor air purification strategies can be employed, including air purifiers (APs) combined with open-window ventilation (AP-Mode) and fresh air units (FAUs) combined with positive pressure control (FAU-Mode). Accordingly, an investigation is required in order to determine which of the two strategies is more suitable for various types of SAC buildings. In this study, firstly, a new method for calculating the mechanical fresh air supply rate needed to maintain a positive room pressure is proposed for SAC buildings. It is concluded that positive room pressure can be maintained if the mechanical fresh air supply rate is more than 3.2 times the natural air infiltration rate (i.e., air infiltration rate when a room is not supplied with mechanical fresh air). Then, based on the mass balance principle of indoor particulate matter, the clean air delivery rates (CADRs) are calculated for APs used in the AP-Mode and FAUs used in the FAU-Mode under different PM2.5 I/O ratios and fresh air supply rates, and the annual energy consumptions of the two strategies are compared. Consequently, it is determined that in most cases, the FAU-Mode has a lower annual energy consumption when used in SAC buildings in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Finally, considering the room airtightness requirement for positive pressure control and the indoor PM2.5 concentration upper limit of 35 mu g/m(3), the AP-Mode should be used in rooms with fresh air requirements lower than 1 h(-1), whereas the FAU-Mode should be used in other cases.
机译:装有分体式空调的建筑物(称为SAC建筑物)未配备机械通风系统。这些建筑物中的新鲜空气供应主要依靠自然通风和空气渗透,这两者都会将室外颗粒物(PM)污染物引入室内环境。为了同时满足新鲜空气和室内PM的浓度要求,可以采用两种室内空气净化策略,包括结合开窗通风的空气净化器(AP)(AP-Mode)和结合正压控制的新鲜空气装置(FAU)( FAU模式)。因此,需要进行调查以确定两种策略中的哪一种更适合于各种类型的SAC建筑物。在这项研究中,首先,对于SAC建筑物,提出了一种计算维持室内正压所需的机械新鲜空气供应率的新方法。结论是,如果机械新鲜空气的供应速率大于自然空气渗透速率的3.2倍(即,当不向室内供应机械新鲜空气时的空气渗透速率),则可以维持正的房间压力。然后,根据室内颗粒物的质量平衡原理,计算在不同PM2.5 I / O比和新鲜空气条件下,AP模式下使用的AP和FAU模式下使用的FAU的清洁空气输送率(CADR)空气供应率和这两种策略的年度能耗进行了比较。因此,可以确定,在大多数情况下,FAU模式在北京,上海和广州的SAC建筑物中使用时具有较低的年能耗。最后,考虑到正压控制的室内气密性要求和室内PM2.5浓度上限为35μg / m(3),应将AP模式用于空气新鲜度要求低于1 h(-1)的房间。 ),而在其他情况下应使用FAU模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号