首页> 外文期刊>Broadcasting & Cable >Broadcasters Are Split On Ownership Appeal
【24h】

Broadcasters Are Split On Ownership Appeal

机译:广播公司因所有权上诉而分裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Broadcasters Are Divided over how the Supreme Court should view a Third Circuit decision upholding most of the Federal Communications Commissions local ownership caps. While broadcasters all want the Supreme Court to hear the appeal of that decision-having filed petitions to that effect last week- they are divided over how deep a dive the court should take into them. Fox, joined by Tribune, Sinclair, Bonneville, The Scranton Times, Clear Channel, Morris Communications and the Newspaper Association of America not only want the High Court to reverse the lower court, but they argue that the spectrum scarcity rationale underpinning media ownership regs in general should be thrown but.
机译:最高人民法院应如何看待第三巡回法院的裁决,支持联邦通信委员会的大多数当地所有权上限,因此广播机构存在分歧。尽管所有广播公司都希望最高法院听取这一决定的上诉,但上周已就此做出了上诉,但他们对法院应向其进行的潜水深度有分歧。福克斯与Tribune,Sinclair,Bonneville,The Scranton Times,Clear Channel,Morris Communications和美国报纸协会一起加入,不仅希望高等法院推翻下级法院,而且他们争辩说,频谱稀缺性的理论支撑了媒体所有权法规的制定。一般应该扔不过。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Broadcasting & Cable》 |2011年第46期|p.18|共1页
  • 作者

    John Eggerton;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:17:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号