首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing
【24h】

A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing

机译:提供有关产前检查信息的三种方法的随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective-To test the effect of extra non-directive information about prenatal testing, given individually or in a class. Setting-Antenatal clinics in a district general hospital and a university hospital. Design-Randomised controlled trial; participants allocated to control group or offer of extra information individually or in class. Subjects-1691 women booking antenatal care before 15 weeks' gestation. Interventions-All participants received the usual information about prenatal tests from hospital staff. Individual participants were offered a separate session with a research midwife in which prenatal screening was described in detail. Class participants were offered the same extra information in an early prenatal class. Main outcome measures-Attendance at extra information sessions; uptake rates of prenatal tests; levels of anxiety, understanding, and satisfaction with decisions. Results-Attendance at classes was lower than at individual sessions (adjusted odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.58). ultrasonography was almost universally accepted (9.9%) and was not affected by either intervention. Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing, high in controls (79%), was lowered in the individual group (0.44; 0.20 to 0.97) and classes (0.39; 0.18 to 0.86). Uptake of screening for Down's syndrome, already low (34%) in controls, was not further depressed by extra information in classes (0.99; 0.70 to 1.39) and was slightly higher in the individual group (1.45; 1.04 to 2.02). Women offered extra information had unproved understanding and were more satisfied with information received; satisfaction with decisions about prenatal testing was unchanged. The offer of individual information reduced anxiety later in pregnancy. Conclusions-Ultrasonography is valued for non-medical reasons and chosen even by fully informed people who eschew prenatal diagnosis. The offer of extra information has no overall adverse effects on anxiety and reduces uptake of blood tests when background uptake rate is high (but not when it is already low). High uptake of prenatal blood tests suggests compliant behaviour and need for more information.
机译:目的-测试关于产前检查的额外非指示性信息的效果,这些信息是单独提供的还是在课堂中提供。在地区综合医院和大学医院设置产前诊所。设计随机对照试验;参与者分配给对照组或单独提供或在课堂上提供其他信息。受试者1691名妇女在妊娠15周之前接受了产前检查。干预措施-所有参与者都从医院工作人员那里获得了有关产前检查的常规信息。单独给参与者提供了一个研究助产士的单独会议,其中详细描述了产前筛查。在产前早期班上为班级参与者提供了相同的额外信息。主要成果指标-参加额外情况介绍会的出席情况;产前检查的摄取率;决策的焦虑,理解和满意程度。班级的结果出席率低于个别会议(调整后的优势比为0.45; 95%置信区间为0.35至0.58)。超声检查几乎被普遍接受(9.9%),并且不受任何干预的影响。个体组(0.44; 0.20至0.97)和类别(0.39; 0.18至0.86)的囊性纤维化测试的摄取率较高(对照组为79%)。唐氏综合症筛查的筛查率在对照组中已经很低(34%),没有被班级中的其他信息(0.99; 0.70至1.39)进一步压低,在单个组中略高(1.45; 1.04至2.02)。提供额外信息的妇女对这种信息的理解没有得到证实,对收到的信息更加满意;对产前检查决定的满意度没有变化。提供个人信息减少了妊娠后期的焦虑。结论超声检查由于非医学原因而受到重视,甚至由避免进行产前诊断的知情人士选择。提供额外的信息不会对焦虑产生整体不利影响,并且在本底摄取率很高时(但在本来就已经很低的情况下)却不会减少血液测试的摄取。大量摄取产前血液检查表明行为依从,需要更多信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号