首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births
【24h】

Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births

机译:计划生育和非计划生育中围产期损失的合作调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective—To document the outcome of planned and unplanned births outside hospital. Design—Confidential review of every pregnancy ending in stillbirth or neonatal death in which plans had been made for home delivery, irrespective of where delivery eventually occurred. The review was part of a sustained collaborative survey of all perinatal deaths. Setting—Northern Regional Health Authority area. Subjects—All 558 691 registered births to women normally resident in the former Northern Regional Health Authority area during 1981-94. Main outcome measure—Perinatal death. Results—The estimated perinatal mortality during 1981-94 among women booked for a home birth was 14 deaths in 2888 births. This was less than half that among all women in the region. Only three of the 14 women delivered outside hospital. Independent review suggested that two of the 14 deaths might have been averted by different management. Both births occurred in hospital, and in only one was management before admission of the mother judged inappropriate. Perinatal loss to the 64 women who booked for hospital delivery but delivered outside and to the 67 women who delivered outside hospital without ever making arrangements to receive professional care during labour accounted for the high perinatal mortality (134 deaths in 3466 deliveries) among all births outside hospital. Conclusions—The perinatal hazard associated with planned home birth in the few women who exercised this option (<1%) was low and mostly unavoidable. Health authorities purchasing maternity care need to address the much greater hazard associated with unplanned delivery outside hospital.
机译:目的—记录医院外计划生育和非计划生育的结果。设计-对每项以死产或新生儿死亡结束的怀孕进行的机密审查,无论计划在何处进行分娩,均已制定了计划分娩。该评估是所有围产期死亡持续合作调查的一部分。设置-北部地区卫生局区域。受试者-在1981-94年期间,通常居住在前北方地区卫生局地区的所有558691名登记生育的妇女。主要结果指标-围产期死亡。结果-在1981-94年间,预订家庭生育的妇女的围产期死亡率估计为2888例中有14例死亡。这不到该区域所有妇女的一半。 14名妇女中只有3名在医院外分娩。独立审查表明,14例死亡中有2例可能是由不同的管理者避免的。两胎均发生在医院,只有一名是在母亲入院前被诊断为不合适的管理人员。在预订的所有分娩中,围产期死亡率很高(在3466例分娩中有134例死亡),这是因为有64例预约分娩但又在医院外分娩的妇女的围产期损失以及67例在没有安排分娩期间接受专业护理的情况下分娩的妇女,其围产期死亡率很高(3466例分娩中有134人死亡)。医院。结论:在极少数行使这种选择的妇女中,与计划的家庭分娩有关的围产期危害(<1%)很少,而且大多数是不可避免的。购买母婴保健的卫生部门需要解决与计划外分娩带来的更大危害。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |1996年第7068期|p.1306-1309|共4页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号