首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of strategies to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment
【24h】

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of strategies to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment

机译:系统评价结核病依从性策略的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of strategies to promote adherence to treatment for tuberculosis. Identification: Searches in Medline (1966 to August 1996), the Cochrane trials register (up to October 1996), and LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud) (1982 to September 1996); screening of references in articles on compliance and adherence; contact with experts in research on tuberculosis and adherence. Inclusion criteria: Randomised or pseudorandomised controlled trials of interventions to promote adherence with curative or preventive treatment for tuberculosis, with at least one measure of adherence. Main outcome measure: Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for estimates of effect for categorical outcomes. Results: Five trials met the inclusion criteria. The relative risk for tested reminder cards sent to patients who defaulted on treatment was 1.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.4), for help given to patients by lay health workers 1.4 (1.1 to 1.8), for monetary incentives offered to patients 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0), for health education 1.2 (1.1 to 1.4), for a combination of a patient incentive and health education 2.4 (1.5 to 3.7) or 1.1 (1.0 to 1.2), and for intensive supervision of staff in tuberculosis clinics 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3). There were no completed trials of directly observed treatment All of the interventions tested improved adherence. On current evidence it is unclear whether health education by itself leads to better adherence to treatment Conclusions: Reliable evidence is available to show some specific strategies improve adherence to tuberculosis treatment, and these should be adopted in health systems, depending on their appropriateness to practice circumstances. Further innovations require testing to help find specific approaches that will be useful in low income countries. Randomised controlled trials evaluating the independent effects of directly observed treatment are awaited.
机译:目的:确定提高对结核病治疗依从性的策略的有效性。身份:在Medline(1966年至1996年8月),Cochrane试验登记簿(至1996年10月)和LILACS(拉丁裔美洲和加勒比加勒比海地区的Salud)(1982年至1996年9月)中进行搜索;筛选有关合规性和遵守性的文章中的参考文献;与结核病和依从性研究专家联系。纳入标准:以治愈或预防性治疗促进结核病依从性的干预措施的随机或伪随机对照试验,至少采用一种依从性措施。主要结果度量:相对风险和95%置信区间,用于估计分类结果的效果。结果:五项试验符合纳入标准。发送给拖欠治疗的患者的测试提醒卡的相对风险是1.2(95%置信区间1.1至1.4),外行医护人员1.4(1.1至1.8)为患者提供帮助,向患者提供金钱奖励1.6( 1.3至2.0),健康教育1.2(1.1至1.4),患者激励与健康教育2.4(1.5至3.7)或1.1(1.0至1.2)的结合以及对结核病诊所1.2中工作人员的强化监督1.1至1.3)。没有直接观察到的治疗的完整试验。所有测试的干预措施都能改善依从性。根据目前的证据,尚不清楚健康教育本身是否会导致更好地坚持治疗。结论:有可靠的证据表明某些具体策略可提高对结核病治疗的依从性,这些策略应在卫生系统中采用,取决于其对实际情况的适当性。 。进一步的创新需要测试,以帮助找到对低收入国家有用的特定方法。等待评估直接观察到的治疗的独立作用的随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号