首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Are placebo run ins justified?
【24h】

Are placebo run ins justified?

机译:安慰剂是否合理?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The placebo, it is agreed, is an excellent aid in determining the specific pharmacological effects of pharmaceutical agents. Any criticisms of placebos have usually been directed at the morality of giving an inert substance to patients hoping for effective treatment. Indeed, it might be argued that the object of drug development is to make the use of placebos unethical: to find a treatment that is so effective that it will be unacceptable to withhold it in the future. The debate has focused on acute conditions (especially if serious), where the ethical stakes are highest. For chronic conditions (especially if they are less severe) the situation is different Here the patient may have to live with the condition for many years and, in his or her own interest be prepared to try a number of treatments— including, from time to time, no treatment at all. With informed consent the use of placebos in randomised clinical trials may then be uncontroversial.
机译:公认的安慰剂是确定药剂的特定药理作用的极好帮助。对安慰剂的任何批评通常都针对向希望有效治疗的患者提供惰性物质的道德。的确,有人可能会争辩说,药物开发的目的是使安慰剂的使用不道德:找到一种有效的治疗方法,以至于将来不再使用它是不可接受的。辩论的重点是在紧急情况下(尤其是严重的情况),在这些情况下,道德风险最高。对于慢性病(尤其是病情较轻的情况),情况会有所不同。在这里,患者可能不得不忍受多年的病情,并且为了自己的利益,准备尝试多种治疗方法,包括不时进行治疗。时间,一点都不治疗。在知情同意的情况下,在随机临床试验中使用安慰剂可能不会引起争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号