...
首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Evidence based mergers?
【24h】

Evidence based mergers?

机译:循证合并?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The NHS seems to be in the grips of "merger mania." Why is this happening and why now? More importantly, on what basis do we judge whether the merger of two or more NHS organisations is successful and is there an evidence base on how to manage them? Seventeen mergers of NHS trusts took place in England in 1991-7. The cycle of trust establishment and merger activity follows the NHS financial year. Twenty three mergers came into effect from 1 April 1998, and ministers are considering further proposals for April 1999. In Scotland's current "reconfiguration" the number of trusts is planned to reduce from 47 to 26, and in Wales 26 trusts will be reconfigured into 16 by April 1999. The government sees these mergers as "evidence of a new cooperative culture developing inside the NHS." Laudably the key test that will be applied in judging the merits of merger proposals will be whether they improve patient care. All will also have to lead to proved reductions in bureaucracy.
机译:NHS似乎处于“合并狂潮”的控制之下。为什么会这样,为什么现在呢?更重要的是,我们如何判断两个或多个NHS组织的合并是否成功,并且是否有关于如何管理它们的证据? 1991-7年,NHS信托基金发生了十七次合并。信托建立和合并活动的周期遵循NHS财政年度。从1998年4月1日起有23项合并生效,部长们正在考虑到1999年4月的进一步提议。在苏格兰目前的“重组”中,信托的数量计划从47个减少到26个,在威尔士,将26个信托重组为16个。到1999年4月为止。政府将这些合并视为“国民保健服务系统内部发展新的合作文化的证据”。值得称赞的是,在判断合并提案的优劣时将采用的关键测试是它们是否可以改善患者护理。所有这些都将导致官僚主义的证明减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号