首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Commentary: Dosage needs systematic and critical review
【24h】

Commentary: Dosage needs systematic and critical review

机译:评论:剂量需要系统和严格的审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The systematic review by Holt and colleagues is in principle simple and straightforward. They would have been able to do an even more thorough job had they been provided with the data on individual patients from the studies, but their conclusion is convincing and important. With any new drug that has therapeutic activity, an appropriate dosage regimen must be worked out from a clear understanding of the pharmacokinetics and the dose-response relation. When these are known, sensible decisions can be made on the starting dosage, the minimum time to allow before increasing the dose, dose increments, and the maximum useful dose. Why did it take until now, from the first marketing of fluticasone in 1993, to discover that the maximum useful dosage for most cases is only about half of that hitherto recommended by guidelines and the manufacturer? How did the data emerge, and why were they not used earlier?
机译:Holt及其同事的系统评价原则上很简单明了。如果向他们提供研究中各个患者的数据,他们本来可以做得更加彻底,但是他们的结论令人信服且重要。对于具有治疗活性的任何新药,必须从对药代动力学和剂量反应关系的清楚了解中制定出适当的剂量方案。如果知道这些,就可以对起始剂量,增加剂量之前允许的最短时间,剂量增加以及最大有用剂量做出明智的决定。为什么从1993年首次开始氟替卡松起直到现在才发现,在大多数情况下,最大有效剂量仅是指南和制造商建议的迄今推荐剂量的一半?数据是如何出现的,为什么不更早使用?

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |2001年第7307期|p.256|共1页
  • 作者

    Andrew Herxheimer;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:12:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号