首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy after cardiac surgery: systematic review
【24h】

Prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy after cardiac surgery: systematic review

机译:心脏手术后的预防性呼吸物理治疗:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective To assess whether respiratory physiotherapy prevents pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery. Data sources Searches through Medline, Embase, Cinahl, the Cochrane library, and bibliographies, for randomised trials comparing any type of prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy with another type or no intervention after cardiac surgery, with a follow up of at least two days, and reporting on respiratory outcomes. Review methods Investigators assessed trial validity independently. Information on study design, population, interventions, and end points was abstracted by one investigator and checked by the others. Results 18 trials (1457 patients) were identified. Most were of low quality. They tested physical therapy (13 trials), incentive spirometry (eight), continuous positive airway pressure (five), and intermittent positive pressure breathing (three). The maximum follow up was six days. Four trials only had a no intervention control; none showed any significant benefit of physiotherapy. Across all trials and interventions, average values postoperatively were: incidence of atelectasis, 15-98%; incidence of pneumonia, 0-20%; partial pressure of arterial oxygen per inspired oxygen fraction, 212-329 mm Hg; vital capacity, 37-72% of preoperative values; and forced expiratory volume in one second, 34-72%. No intervention showed superiority for any end point For the most labour intensive intervention, continuous positive airway pressure, the average labour cost for each patient day was EUD27 (£19; $32). Conclusions The usefulness of respiratory physiotherapy for the prevention of pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery remains unproved. Large randomised trials are needed with no intervention controls, clinically relevant end points, and reasonable follow up periods.
机译:目的探讨呼吸理疗能否预防心脏手术后的肺部并发症。数据来源通过Medline,Embase,Cinahl,Cochrane库和参考书目进行搜索,以比较将心脏外科手术后任何类型的预防性呼吸物理治疗与另一种类型的心脏干预或无干预的随机试验进行比较,至少随访两天,并报告呼吸结果。审查方法研究者独立评估试验的有效性。有关研究设计,人群,干预措施和终点的信息已由一名研究者提取,并由其他研究者检查。结果确定了18项试验(1457例患者)。多数是低质量的。他们测试了物理疗法(13次试验),肺活量测定法(八次),持续气道正压(五次)和间歇性正压呼吸(三次)。最长随访时间为六天。只有四项试验没有干预措施。没有人显示理疗有任何明显的好处。在所有试验和干预措施中,术后平均值为:肺不张发生率,15-98%;肺炎的发生率,0-20%;每个吸入氧气分数的动脉氧气分压,212-329 mm Hg;肺活量,占术前值的37-72%;一秒内的强制呼气量为34-72%。没有任何干预措施对任何终点均显示出优势对于大多数劳动密集型干预措施,持续的气道正压通气,每位患者每天的平均人工成本为EUD27(£ 19; 32美元)。结论呼吸物理治疗对预防心脏手术后肺部并发症的有用性尚未得到证实。需要大型的随机试验,没有干预措施,临床相关终点和合理的随访时间。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |2003年第7428期|p.1379-1381|共3页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Surgical Intensive Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Surgical Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号