首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Proactive asthma care in childhood: general practice based randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Proactive asthma care in childhood: general practice based randomised controlled trial

机译:儿童期哮喘的积极治疗:基于一般常规的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a general practice based, proactive system of asthma care in children. Design Randomised controlled trial with cluster sampling by general practice. Setting General practices in the northern region of the Australian Capital Territory. Participants 174 children with moderate to severe asthma who attended 24 general practitioners. Intervention System of structured asthma care (the 3+ visit plan), with participating families reminded to attend the general practitioner. Main outcome measures Process measures: rates for asthma consultations with general practitioner, written asthma plans, completion of the 3+ visit plan; clinical measures: rates for emergency department visits for asthma, days absent from school, symptom-free days, symptoms over the past year, activity limitation over the past year, and asthma drug use over the past year; spirometric lung function measures before and after cold air challenge. Results Intervention group children had significantly more asthma related consultations (odds ratio for three or more asthma related consultations 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 7.6; P = 0.0001), written asthma plans (2.2 (1.2 to 4.1); P = 0.01), and completed 3+ visit plans (24.2 (5.7 to 103.2); P = 0.0001) than control children and a mean reduction in measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second after cold air challenge of 2.6% (1.7 to 3.5); P= 0.0001) less than control children. The number needed to treat (benefit) for one additional written asthma action plan was 5 (3 to 41) children. Intervention group children had lower emergency department attendance rates for asthma (odds ratio 0.4 (0.2 to 1.04); P = 0.06) and less speech limiting wheeze (0.2 (0.1 to 0.4); P = 0.0001) than control children and were more likely to use a spacer (2.8 (1.6 to 4.7); P = 0.0001). No differences occurred in number of days absent from school or symptom-free day scores. Conclusions Proactive care with active recall for children with moderate to severe asthma is feasible in general practice and seems to be beneficial.
机译:目的评估基于一般实践的儿童哮喘主动预防系统的可行性和有效性。根据常规做法,采用整群抽样设计随机对照试验。在澳大利亚首都领地的北部地区制定一般做法。参与者174位患有中度至重度哮喘的儿童参加了24名全科医生。结构性哮喘护理的干预系统(3岁以上就诊计划),提醒参与的家庭要参加全科医生。主要结果指标措施指标:与全科医生进行哮喘咨询的费用,书面哮喘计划,3 +就诊计划的完成;临床措施:急诊科就诊哮喘的比率,缺勤天数,无症状天数,过去一年的症状,过去一年的活动受限以及过去一年的哮喘药物使用情况;在进行冷空气刺激之前和之后进行肺功能肺功能测定。结果干预组儿童进行哮喘相关咨询的次数明显增加(三项或以上与哮喘相关咨询的比值3.8(95%置信区间1.9至7.6; P = 0.0001),书面哮喘计划(2.2(1.2至4.1); P = 0.01) ,并完成了3个以上的探访计划(24.2(5.7至103.2); P = 0.0001),并且冷空气攻击后一秒钟的强制呼气量测量值平均降低了2.6%(1.7至3.5); P = 0.0001)低于对照儿童。一项新的书面哮喘病行动计划需要治疗(获益)的人数是5(3至41)名儿童。干预组儿童的哮喘急诊就诊率较低(奇数比为0.4(0.2至1.04); P = 0.06),言语限制喘息的发生率较低(0.2(0.1至0.4); P = 0.0001),并且与对照组儿童相比更容易发生。使用垫片(2.8(1.6至4.7); P = 0.0001)。缺勤天数或无症状天数没有差异。结论对中度至重度哮喘患儿进行积极的主动回忆治疗在一般实践中是可行的,并且似乎是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号