首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Does it matter what a hospital is 'high volume' for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data
【24h】

Does it matter what a hospital is 'high volume' for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data

机译:“大容量”医院的用途是否重要?医院手术量结果协会的特异性:行政数据分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To determine whether the improved outcome of a surgical procedure in high volume hospitals is specific to the volume of the same procedure. Design and setting Analysis of secondary data in Ontario, Canada. Participants Patients having an oesophagectomy, colorectal resection for cancer, pancreaticoduodenectomy, major lung resection for cancer, or repair of an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1994 and 1999. Main outcome measures Odds ratio for death within 30 days of surgery in relation to the hospital volume of the same surgical procedure and the hospital volume of the other four procedures. Estimates were adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity and accounted for hospital level clustering. Results With the exception of colorectal resection, 30 day mortality seemed to be inversely related not only to the hospital volume of the same procedure but also to me hospital volume of most of the other procedures. In some cases the effect of the volume of a different procedure was stronger than the effect of the volume of the same procedure. For example, the association of mortality from pancreaticoduodenectomy with hospital volume of lung resection (odds ratio for death in hospitals with a high volume of lung resection compared with low volume 0.36,95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.57) was much stronger than the association of mortality from pancreaticoduodenectomy with hospital volume of pancreaticoduodenectomy (0.76, 0.44 to 1.32). Conclusion The inverse association between high volume of procedure and risk of operative death is not specific to the volume of the procedure being studied.
机译:目的确定在高容量医院中手术过程的改善结果是否特定于同一过程的数量。设计和设置加拿大安大略省的二级数据分析。研究对象:1994年至1999年间经食道切除术,结肠直肠癌切除术,胰十二指肠切除术,癌症大肺切除术或腹主动脉瘤破裂的患者。主要结局指标是相对于医院容量,手术后30天内死亡的赔率相同的手术程序和其他四个程序的医院数量。根据年龄,性别和合并症对估计值进行调整,并考虑医院级别的聚类。结果除结直肠切除术外,30天死亡率似乎不仅与相同手术的医院数量成反比,而且与大多数其他手术的医院数量成反比。在某些情况下,不同程序的体积效果要强于相同程序的体积效果。例如,胰十二指肠切除术的死亡率与肺切除术的医院数量的关系(肺切除术高的医院的死亡率与低肺切除术的医院的死亡率之比为0.36,95%置信区间0.23至0.57)要比胰十二指肠切除术的病死率与胰十二指肠切除术的住院量(0.76,0.44至1.32)相关。结论高手术量与手术死亡风险之间的负相关关系并非特定于所研究的手术量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |2004年第7442期|p.737-740|共4页
  • 作者

    David R Urbach; Nancy N Baxter;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, 9EN-236A, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号