【24h】

Spinoza on the Essences of Modes

机译:斯宾诺莎关于模式的本质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines some aspects of Spinoza's metaphysics of the essences of modes.2 2I would like to thank John Carriero, Calvin Normore, Eliot Michaelson, Eileen Nutting, Paul Nichols, Alexi Patsaouras, Rachel Johnson and Sarah Jansen for reading and commenting on earlier versions of this paper. View all notes I situate Spinoza's use of the notion of essence as a response to traditional, Aristotelian, ways of thinking about essence. I argue that, although Spinoza rejects part of the Aristotelian conception of essence, according to which it is in virtue of its essence that a thing is a member of a kind, he nevertheless retains a different part of such a conception, according to which an essence is some structural feature of a thing which causally explains other, non-essential features. I go on to develop an account of Spinoza's metaphysics of essence, according to which essences, what he sometimes calls formal essences, are produced by the divine essence prior to and independent of the creation of finite modes, and according to which essences are the formal or exemplar causes of finite modes. I then argue that finite modes, in virtue of the formal essences which they actualize, are genuine causal relata. Finally, I offer some speculations about Spinoza's answer to the question, ‘Why, in a necessitarian cosmos filled with formal essences, should there be temporal finite modes at all?’ View full textDownload full textKeywordsSpinoza, essence, causation, mode, substanceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2011.533010
机译:本文研究了斯宾诺莎关于模式本质的形而上学的某些方面。22我要感谢约翰·卡里约(John Carriero),卡尔文·诺莫尔(Calvin Normore),艾略特·迈克尔森(Eliot Michaelson),艾琳·纳丁(Eileen Nutting),保罗·尼科尔斯(Paul Nichols),阿列克西·帕特萨罗斯(Alexi Patsaouras),瑞秋·约翰逊(Rachel Johnson)和莎拉·詹森(Sarah Jansen)对早期版本的阅读和评论。本文。查看所有说明,我将斯宾诺莎对本质概念的使用作为对传统的亚里士多德式思考本质的方式的回应。我认为,尽管斯宾诺莎拒绝了亚里士多德的本质概念的一部分,根据它的本质,事物是某种类型的成员,但斯宾诺莎仍然保留了这种概念的不同部分,据此,本质是事物的某些结构特征,可以解释其他非必要的特征。我继续阐述斯宾诺莎的本质形而上学,根据这种形而上学,他有时称其为形式性本质,是由神圣的本质在有限模式的产生之前产生的,并且与有限模式的产生无关,并且根据这些本质而形式化或有限模式的典型原因。然后,我认为有限模式凭借其所体现的形式本质,才是真正的因果关系。最后,我对斯宾诺莎的答案提出了一些推测:“为什么在一个充满形式本质的必然主义宇宙中,根本不应该存在时间有限模式?”查看全文下载全文关键字关键字斯宾诺莎,本质,因果,模式,实质相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2011.533010

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号