This paper argues that an examination of the ontology that underpins Descartesâs Fifth Meditation ontological proof of Godâs existence will contribute to a better understanding of the nature and structure of the proof. Attention to the Cartesian meditatorâs development of this ontology in earlier meditations also makes clear why this proof could not have been asserted before the Fifth Meditation. Finally, it is argued that Kantâs objections against the ontological proof have no force against Descartesâ particular version of the proof.View full textDownload full textKeywordsOntological proof, Descartes, Kant, Being, PerfectionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2011.650973
展开▼
机译：本文认为，对构成笛卡尔第五冥想关于上帝存在的本体论证据的本体论的考察将有助于更好地理解该论证的性质和结构。笛卡尔禅修者在早期冥想中对这种本体论的发展的关注也清楚地说明了为什么在第五次冥想之前就不能断言这一证明。最后，有人争辩说，康德对本体论证明的反对并没有反对笛卡尔的特定版本的证明。查看全文下载全文关键词关键字本体论证明，笛卡尔，康德，生命，完美相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“ Taylor ＆Francis Online”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2011.650973
展开▼
