【24h】

‘Securing’ the Past

机译:“确保”过去

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The question of whether Northern Ireland should have a formal truth recovery process has been amplified by the recent Report of the Consultative Group on the Past. Compared to the volume at which the truth recovery debate has been played out, relatively little is known about policing attitudes to this form of dealing with the past. This paper analyses the ways in which the history and context of policing in Northern Ireland have shaped attitudes towards truth recovery. It will be argued that differing opinions on the need for truth recovery are part of a debate over ‘ownership of the past’ between the ardent supporters of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the new post-Patten managers and modernizers.
机译:过去协商小组最近的报告扩大了北爱尔兰是否应进行正式的真相追回程序的问题。与进行真相恢复辩论的数量相比,对于这种对过去的处理形式维持治安态度所知甚少。本文分析了北爱尔兰警务的历史和背景如何塑造了对真相追回的态度。有人会争辩说,对于皇家真相支持者和新的后帕滕执政者和现代化者的热心支持者,关于恢复真相的不同观点是“过去拥有”辩论的一部分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Criminology, The》 |2010年第3期|p.455-473|共19页
  • 作者

    Cheryl Lawther;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, School of Law, Queen's University Belfast, 28 University Square, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:12:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号