首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Criminology, The >Indigeneity And The Judicial Decision To Imprison
【24h】

Indigeneity And The Judicial Decision To Imprison

机译:土著性与监禁的司法决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Internationally, sentencing research has largely neglected the impact of Indigeneity on sentencing outcomes. Using data from Western Australia's higher courts for the years 2003–05, we investigate the direct and interactive effects of Indigenous status on the judicial decision to imprison. Unlike prior research on race/ethnicity in which minority offenders are often found to be more harshly treated by sentencing courts, we find that Indigenous status has no direct effect on the decision to imprison, after adjusting for other sentencing factors (especially past and current criminality). However, there are sub-group differences: Indigenous males are more likely to receive a prison sentence compared to non-Indigenous females. We draw on the focal concerns perspective of judicial decision making in interpreting our findings.
机译:在国际上,量刑研究在很大程度上忽略了土著对量刑结果的影响。利用西澳大利亚州高等法院2003-05年度的数据,我们调查了土著身份对监禁司法判决的直接和互动影响。与先前关于种族/族裔的研究不同,在种族/族裔研究中,经常会发现少数罪犯会受到量刑法庭的更严厉对待,我们发现,在调整了其他量刑因素(特别是过去和现在的犯罪)之后,土著身份对监禁的决定没有直接影响。 )。但是,存在亚组差异:与非土著女性相比,土著男性更有可能被判入狱。在解释我们的发现时,我们借鉴了司法决策的关注焦点观点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Criminology, The》 |2011年第2期|p.256-277|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Dr. Christine Bond, School of Justice, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2343, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia;

    ,Dr. Samantha Jeffries, School of Justice, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2343, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:12:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号