首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Criminology >Public Opinion Towards the Lay Magistracy and the Sentencing Council Guidelines
【24h】

Public Opinion Towards the Lay Magistracy and the Sentencing Council Guidelines

机译:裁判法院及量刑委员会指引的舆论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public opinion surveys have long documented public criticism of ‘lenient’ sentencers. There are two principal perceptions contributing to negative attitudes: a lack of community input and the view that sentencers determine sentence according to their own views. This study embeds an experimental design within a representative survey of respondents in England and Wales (n = 1,004), supplemented by laboratory-based work (n = 230) and focus groups. Results demonstrated that the public is ill-informed about both the magistracy and the sentencing guidelines. In addition, providing information about sentencing changed public attitudes to sentencing and reduced public punitiveness. Respondents were less critical of disposals and less punitive in their own sentence recommendations when they had been given context about the structure of sentencing.
机译:长期以来,舆论调查记录了公众对“宽大”判刑者的批评。有两种主要的看法会导致消极态度:缺乏社区的投入和认为判决者根据自己的观点来决定句子的观点。这项研究将实验设计嵌入到对英格兰和威尔士(n = 1,004)的受访者的代表性调查中,并辅以实验室工作(n = 230)和焦点小组。结果表明,公众对治安法官和量刑指南均知之甚少。此外,提供有关量刑的信息会改变公众对量刑的态度,并减少公众惩罚。当被调查者获得有关量刑结构的背景信息时,他们对自己处分的批评并不那么苛刻,惩罚性也更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号