首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Aesthetics, The >Instructions and Artworks: Musical Scores, Theatrical Scripts, Architectural Plans, and Screenplays
【24h】

Instructions and Artworks: Musical Scores, Theatrical Scripts, Architectural Plans, and Screenplays

机译:说明和艺术作品:乐谱,戏剧剧本,建筑计划和剧本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay offers an account of the relationship between screenplay and film, and it does so by comparing this relationship to the relationships that hold between other sets of instructions and artworks: score and musical work, theatrical script and theatrical work, architectural plan and architectural work. I argue that musical scores and theatrical scripts are work-determinative documents—manuscripts whose existence entails the existence of musical works and theatrical works, respectively, and which determine the facts about what those works are like. On the contrary, I argue that architectural plans and screenplays are not work-determinative because they alone do not entail the existence of any architectural work or film. Nevertheless, I conclude that this difference has no bearing upon art status: theatrical scripts are almost always artworks in their own right, musical scores almost never are, and architectural plans are in certain cases. This conclusion suggests that although the relationship between theatrical script and theatrical work is quite different from that between screenplay and film, there is no reason to think that screenplays cannot be literary artworks in their own right.
机译:本文通过将剧本与电影之间的关系与其他指令和艺术品之间的关系进行比较来说明这一点:分数和音乐作品,戏剧剧本和戏剧作品,建筑计划和建筑作品。我认为乐谱和戏剧剧本是作品决定性文件,手稿的存在分别意味着音乐作品和戏剧作品的存在,并决定了这些作品的真实情况。相反,我认为建筑计划和电影剧本不是工作决定性的,因为它们本身并不意味着存在任何建筑作品或电影。不过,我得出的结论是,这种差异与艺术地位无关:戏剧剧本几乎总是以其自身的权利而为艺术品,乐谱几乎从未如此,并且在某些情况下是建筑计划。这个结论表明,尽管戏剧剧本和戏剧作品之间的关系与剧本和电影之间的关系有很大的不同,但没有理由认为剧本本身并不是文学作品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号