...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain and cognition >Using an emotional saccade task to characterize executive functioning and emotion processing in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar disorder
【24h】

Using an emotional saccade task to characterize executive functioning and emotion processing in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar disorder

机译:使用情绪扫视任务来表征注意力缺陷多动障碍和躁郁症的执行功能和情绪处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite distinct diagnostic criteria, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and bipolar disorder (BD) share cognitive and emotion processing deficits that complicate diagnoses. The goal of this study was to use an emotional saccade task to characterize executive functioning and emotion processing in adult ADHD and BD. Participants (21 control, 20 ADHD, 20 BD) performed an interleaved pro/antisaccade task (look toward vs. look away from a visual target, respectively) in which the sex of emotional face stimuli acted as the cue to perform either the pro- or antisaccade. Both patient groups made more direction (erroneous prosaccades on antisaccade trials) and anticipatory (saccades made before cue processing) errors than controls. Controls exhibited lower microsaccade rates preceding correct anti- vs. prosaccade initiation, but this task-related modulation was absent in both patient groups. Regarding emotion processing, the ADHD group performed worse than controls on neutral face trials, while the BD group performed worse than controls on trials presenting faces of all valence. These findings support the role of fronto-striatal circuitry in mediating response inhibition deficits in both ADHD and BD, and suggest that such deficits are exacerbated in BD during emotion processing, presumably via dysregulated limbic system circuitry involving the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex.
机译:尽管有不同的诊断标准,但注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和双相情感障碍(BD)的认知和情感处理能力不足,使诊断变得复杂。这项研究的目的是使用情感扫视任务来表征成人ADHD和BD的执行功能和情感处理。参与者(21个对照组,20个ADHD,20个BD)执行了交错的pro / antisaccade任务(分别朝着目视与远离视觉目标的视线),其中,情绪面部刺激的性别充当了执行pro-antisaccade的提示。或反扫视。与对照组相比,这两个患者组的指导(错误扫盲试验错误)和预期(提示处理前错误扫盲)的方向都更多。对照在正确的抗-抗前列腺素诱发前显示较低的微囊扫率,但是在两个患者组中都没有这种与任务相关的调节。在情绪处理方面,ADHD组在中性面部试验中的表现比对照组差,而BD组在呈现所有价态面部的试验中的表现差于对照组。这些发现支持额叶纹状体回路在介导ADHD和BD中应答抑制缺陷中的作用,并表明在情绪处理期间BD中此类缺陷加剧,大概是通过涉及前扣带和眶额皮质的边缘系统回路失调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号