...
首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >ATTORNEYS' FEES AND THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RULE 68 AND THE CLEAN WATER ACT'S CITIZEN SUIT PROVISION
【24h】

ATTORNEYS' FEES AND THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RULE 68 AND THE CLEAN WATER ACT'S CITIZEN SUIT PROVISION

机译:律师费用以及第68条与《清洁水法》规定的居民服刑之间的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental "citizen suit" statutes provide incentives for citizens to bring enforcement actions by awarding successful plaintiffs reasonable attorneys' fees. Defendants have attempted to use Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 to block a successful plaintiff's recovery of attorneys' fees. Under Rule 68, defendants may offer to allow a judgment to be issued against them for a fixed dollar amount: Plaintiffs may either accept this judgment offer or proceed to trial. If plaintiffs proceed to trial, however, they must receive a judgment more favorable than the offer or pay the defendants' litigation costs. Defendants argue that the word "costs" as used in Rule 68 applies to attorneys' fees in addition to other litigation costs. If so, the use of Rule 68 can have a great influence on the economics of citizen suit litigation. This Note explores whether or not Rule 68 should be read to apply to attorneys' fees in citizen suits under the Clean Water Act and other environmental statutes.
机译:环境“公民诉讼”法规通过奖励成功的原告合理的律师费,鼓励公民提起执法行动。被告试图利用《联邦民事诉讼程序规则》 68阻止成功的原告追回律师费。根据《规则》第68条,被告可以提议允许以固定的美元金额对他们作出判决:原告可以接受该判决要约,也可以进行审判。但是,如果原告继续审判,他们必须接受比要约更有利的判决,或者支付被告的诉讼费用。被告辩称,规则68中使用的“费用”一词除适用于其他诉讼费用外,还适用于律师费。如果是这样,则规则68的使用可能会对公民诉讼的经济性产生重大影响。本说明探讨了是否应将规则68解读为适用于《清洁水法》和其他环境法规所规定的公民诉讼中的律师费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号