首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >BIO-PROSPECTING IN THE ARCTIC: AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING
【24h】

BIO-PROSPECTING IN THE ARCTIC: AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING

机译:北极地区的生物勘探:土著人民权利与获取和惠益分享之间的相互作用概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The exploration and exploitation of marine genetic resources for commercial purposes is growing at an unprecedented rate in the Arctic region. Currently, there is no explicit legal framework that governs the participation of Arctic indigenous peoples in this industry or requires that the benefits derived from the scientific use of marine genetic resources are shared with these groups. This Article analyzes to what extent the principles of free, prior, and informed consent and of fair and equitable benefit sharing are considered in relevant international instruments. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is not sufficient to frame this international issue. Therefore, this Article pays special attention to the scope of indigenous people's rights as outlined in the International Labour Organization's Convention (No. 169) Concerning Indigenous Peoples and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This Article incorporates those principles of consent and benefit sharing into the international framework governing the use of biodiversity materials, through the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol.
机译:在北极地区,用于商业目的的海洋遗传资源的勘探和开发正以前所未有的速度增长。目前,尚无明确的法律框架来管理北极土著人民参与该行业,或要求与这些群体分享科学利用海洋遗传资源所产生的惠益。本条分析了相关国际文书在多大程度上考虑了自由,事先和知情同意以及公平,公正的利益分享的原则。 《联合国海洋法公约》不足以解决这个国际问题。因此,本条特别注意国际劳工组织《关于土著人民的公约》(第169号)和《联合国土著人民权利宣言》所概述的土著人民权利的范围。本条通过《生物多样性公约》和《名古屋议定书》,将那些同意和利益分享的原则纳入管理生物多样性材料使用的国际框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号