首页> 外文期刊>Biosemiotics >Cast in Plastic: Semiotic Plasticity and the Pragmatic Reading of Darwin
【24h】

Cast in Plastic: Semiotic Plasticity and the Pragmatic Reading of Darwin

机译:铸塑:符号学的可塑性和达尔文的实用阅读

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As Darwin portended but failed to develop, and of which Gould made much, the forensic evidence of evolution points toward Punctuated Equilibrium rather than Phyletic Gradualism; however Gould’s empirical postulation has long suffered from its lack of a testable theoretical basis. This is rectified by the work of Jaroslav Flegr and the Frozen Plasticity Theory, a hypothesis with striking application within semiotic theory and hence to questions of epistemology and ontology. The consequences of applying FPT within Biosemiotics is this: when any particular sign carries a great range of interpretation (semiotic polymorphism) combined with a high degree of mutually supportive referencing (semiotic pleiotropy), that sign is less likely to exhibit plasticity—less able to find new expressions capable of taking on a life of their own (as it were), but more likely to exhibit elasticity, and the flexibility necessary to survive a wide variety of niches. By contrast, much Darwinian and most Neo-Darwinian thought presumes that plasticity is equally and necessarily present in all living things, and that all populations thus slowly evolve. This devalues the point of interplay of such processes, which is the instigation of a specific instance of relating both delineated by and delineating its own unique heritage, and a phenomenon of signage. The presumption that these moments of transaction are all of a singular type has generated certain failures in extrapolating from evolutionary theory to understanding the experience of life. However Darwin was read differently by Darwin’s philosophical champion and Peirce’s “boxing master” Chauncey Wright. Using the historical encounter of the early Pragmatists with Origin, the hypothesis that Peirce’s Pragmatism and Semiotics originated within a study of the ontology implicit within Darwin’s one long argument, and also an evocative import from Sir Edward Strachey, this essay approaches Frozen Plasticity as a theoretical semiosis, so as to clarify the functioning of signage in evolution and cognition.
机译:正如达尔文所预见的那样,但未能发展,而古尔德做了很多事情,进化的法证证据指向标点均衡而不是系统渐进主义。但是,古尔德的经验假设长期以来一直缺乏可验证的理论基础。 Jaroslav Flegr和“冻结可塑性理论”的工作纠正了这一问题,该假说在符号学理论中得到了广泛应用,因此也被应用于认识论和本体论问题。在生物符号学中应用FPT的后果是:当任何特定符号具有广泛的解释范围(符号多态性)以及高度相互支持的参照(符号多义性)时,该符号不太可能表现出可塑性-较不易找到新的表达方式,这些表达方式可以维持自己的生活(实际上是这样),但更有可能表现出弹性,以及生存于各种壁ni中所必需的灵活性。相比之下,许多达尔文主义和大多数新达尔文主义的思想假定可塑性在所有生物中均等且必不可少,因此所有人口都在缓慢发展。这贬低了这些过程的相互影响的点,这是一个特定实例的鼓动,该实例既通过其自身的独特遗产来描述和描述其自身的独特遗产,又有一种标牌现象。这些交易时刻都是奇异类型的假设在从进化论推论到理解生活经验方面产生了某些失败。但是,达尔文的哲学冠军和皮尔斯的“拳击大师”昌西·赖特(Chauncey Wright)对达尔文的理解却有所不同。利用早期实用主义者与起源的历史encounter触,皮尔士的实用主义和符号学的假设起源于对达尔文的一个长论中隐含的本体论的研究,以及爱德华·斯特拉奇爵士的令人回味的输入,本文将冷冻可塑性作为理论符号,以阐明标牌在进化和认知中的功能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Biosemiotics》 |2011年第1期|p.69-82|共14页
  • 作者

    Gerald Ostdiek;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号