...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of bioenergy production using multi-product crops - case studies for the Netherlands and Poland.
【24h】

Economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of bioenergy production using multi-product crops - case studies for the Netherlands and Poland.

机译:使用多种产品作物进行生物能源生产的经济和温室气体排放分析-荷兰和波兰的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the face of climate change that may result from greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the scarcity of agricultural land and limited competitiveness of biomass energy on the market, it is desirable to increase the performance of bioenergy systems. Multi-product crops, i.e. using a crop partially for energy and partially for material purposes can possibly create additional incomes as well as additional GHG emission reductions. In this study, the performance of several multi-product crop systems is compared to energy crop systems, focused on the costs of primary biomass fuel costs and GHG emission reductions per hectare of biomass production. The sensitivity of the results is studied by means of a Monte-Carlo analysis. The multi-product crops studied are wheat, hemp and poplar in the Netherlands and Poland. GHG emission reductions of these multi-product crop systems are found to be between 0.2 and 2.4 Mg CO2eq/(ha yr) in Poland and 0.9 and 7.8 Mg CO2eq/(ha yr) in the Netherlands, while primary biomass fuel costs range from -4.1 to -1.7 Euro/GJ in the Netherlands and from 0.1 to 9.8 Euro/GJ in Poland. Results show that the economic attractiveness of multi-product crops depends strongly on material market prices, crop production costs and crop yields. Net annual GHG emission reductions per hectare are influenced strongly by the specific GHG emission reduction of material use, reference energy systems and GHG emissions of crop production. Multi-product use of crops can significantly decrease primary biomass fuel costs. However, this does not apply in general, but depends on the kind of crops and material uses. For the examples analysed here, net annual GHG emission reductions per hectare are not lowered by multi-product use of crops. Consequently, multi-product crops are not for granted an option to increase the performance of bioenergy systems. Further research on the feasibility of large-scale multi-product crop systems and their impact on land and material markets is desirable.
机译:面对由温室气体(GHG)排放,农田的稀缺和生物质能源在市场上的竞争力所致的气候变化,人们希望提高生物能源系统的性能。多产品作物,即将作物部分用作能源和部分用于物质目的,可能会创造更多的收入以及温室气体的更多减少。在本研究中,将几种多产品作物系统的性能与能源作物系统进行了比较,重点是主要生物质燃料成本的成本和每公顷生物质生产的温室气体减排量。通过蒙特卡洛分析研究结果的敏感性。在荷兰和波兰,研究的多种产品作物是小麦,大麻和杨树。这些多产品作物系统的温室气体排放量减少量在波兰介于0.2到2.4 Mg CO2eq /(ha yr)之间,在荷兰则介于0.9到7.8 Mg CO2eq /(ha yr)之间,而主要生物质燃料成本在-荷兰为4.1至-1.7欧元/ GJ,波兰为0.1至9.8欧元/ GJ。结果表明,多种产品作物的经济吸引力在很大程度上取决于材料市场价格,作物生产成本和作物产量。每公顷每年净减少的温室气体排放量受到材料使用,参考能源系统和农作物生产的温室气体排放量的特定温室气体减排量的强烈影响。作物的多种产品使用可以显着降低主要生物质燃料的成本。但是,这通常并不适用,而是取决于农作物的种类和材料用途。对于此处分析的示例,作物的多种产品使用不会降低每公顷年净GHG排放量。因此,不能将多种产品的作物作为提高生物能源系统性能的选择。希望进一步研究大规模多产品作物系统的可行性及其对土地和材料市场的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号