首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Fluidized bed co-combustion of rice husk pellets and moisturized rice husk: The effects of co-combustion methods on gaseous emissions
【24h】

Fluidized bed co-combustion of rice husk pellets and moisturized rice husk: The effects of co-combustion methods on gaseous emissions

机译:稻壳颗粒和加湿稻壳的流化床共燃烧:共燃烧方法对气体排放的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work explores the potential of three co-combustion methods for reducing NOxin a fluidized-bed combustor. Pelletized rice husk (base fuel) was co-fired with moisturized rice husk (secondary fuel) in this reactor using silica sand as the bed material. Four groups of experiments for (1) conventional combustion of rice husk pellets, (2) co-firing pre-mixed fuels, (3) co-firing using fuel staging with bottom air injection, and (4) co-firing using a reburning method combining fuel staging and air staging, were performed at a 200 kW heat input to the reactor. In the test series, the energy fraction of the secondary fuel in the total fuel supply (EF2) was within 0–0.25, with excess air (EA) varying from 20% to 80% at given EF2. During the reburning tests, the secondary-to-total air ratio (SA/TA) ranged from 0.1 to 0.4, at each EA. The findings revealed that the effects of EF2, EA, and SA/TA on the combustion and emission characteristics of the reactor were substantial. An optimization analysis was performed to determine the optimal EF2, EA, and SA/TA, leading to minimal emission costs of the applied co-firing techniques. Under optimal operating conditions, the combustor ensures high (∼99%) combustion efficiency with minimum emission costs and reduced NO emission: by about 13% when co-firing pre-mixed fuels, by 37% for the fuel-staged co-combustion, and by 53% when using reburning, as compared to 167–176 cm3 m−1from burning the base fuel alone. However, some increase in the CO and CxHyemissions was observed when using the proposed co-firing techniques.
机译:这项工作探索了三种共燃方法减少流化床燃烧器NOxin的潜力。在该反应器中,使用硅砂作为床料,将粒化的稻壳(基础燃料)与湿润的稻壳(辅助燃料)共烧。四组实验,分别是(1)稻壳颗粒的常规燃烧,(2)预混合燃料共同燃烧,(3)使用底部空气喷射的燃料分级进行联合燃烧以及(4)使用再燃烧进行联合燃烧结合燃料分级和空气分级的方法是在输入反应堆的200 kW热下进行的。在测试系列中,二次燃料在总燃料供应量(EF2)中的能量分数在0-0.25范围内,在给定EF2下,过量空气(EA)的变化范围为20%至80%。在再燃烧测试期间,每个EA的二次空气总空气比(SA / TA)为0.1至0.4。研究结果表明,EF2,EA和SA / TA对反应堆燃烧和排放特性的影响很大。进行了优化分析,以确定最佳的EF2,EA和SA / TA,从而使应用的共烧技术的排放成本降至最低。在最佳运行条件下,燃烧器可确保最高的燃烧效率(约99%),同时排放成本最低,并减少NO排放:将预混合燃料共同燃烧时,燃烧效率可降低约13%;对于阶段性混合燃烧,燃烧器可降低37%与使用单独燃烧基础燃料的167–176 cm3 m-1相比,使用再燃烧时减少了53%。但是,当使用建议的共烧技术时,观察到CO和CxHye排放量有所增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号