首页> 外文期刊>Biological Rhythm Research >The Medical Subject Headings® thesaurus remains inaccurate and incomplete for electronic indexing and retrieval of chronobiologic references
【24h】

The Medical Subject Headings® thesaurus remains inaccurate and incomplete for electronic indexing and retrieval of chronobiologic references

机译:电子主题索引和年代生物学参考文献检索的医学主题词词典仍然不准确且不完整

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to reassess and compare the usefulness of the National Library of Medicine (NLM)'s Medical Subject Headings® (MeSH) thesaurus for electronic indexing and retrieval of chronobiologic bibliography, after 4 years from a previous study on the same subject (Portaluppi F. 2007114. Portaluppi, F. 2007. Consistency and accuracy of the medical subject headings thesaurus for electronic indexing and retrieval of chronobiologic references. Chronobiol Int , 24: 1213-1229. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]View all references. Consistency and accuracy of the medical subject headings thesaurus for electronic indexing and retrieval of chronobiologic references. Chronobiol Int. 24:1213-1229) which demonstrated inconsistent and inaccurate results obtained with existing chronobiologic MeSH terms and suggested the inclusion in the MeSH thesaurus of some common chronobiologic concepts and definitions. A sample set of 219 recent chronobiologic references was downloaded from the MEDLINE®'s database together with all MeSH entries associated with them. The following descriptors of obvious chronobiologic relevance were reanalyzed: “chronobiology”, “chronobiology disorders”, “biological clocks”, “circadian rhythm”, “chronotherapy”, “periodicity”, “seasons”, “sleep disorders, circadian rhythm” and “time factors”. Results were comparable with the previous study that we did 4 years ago. The MeSH terms of obvious chronobiologic significance are still inconsistently and inaccurately retrieving chronobiologic references, while none of the common chronobiologic concepts that we suggested have been included in the MeSH thesaurus, which remains largely incomplete for chronobiologic use.View full textDownload full textKeywordschronobiology, automatic data processing, medline, medical subject headings, national institutes of health, national library of medicine, reproducibility of resultsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2011.613619
机译:这项研究的目的是重新评估和比较国家医学图书馆(NLM)的Medical SubjectHeadings®(MeSH)词库对电子索引和年代学参考书目检索的效用,此前该研究历时4年。主题(Portaluppi F. 2007114. Portaluppi,F. 2007.用于电子索引和年代生物学参考文献检索的医学主题词库的一致性和准确性。Chronobiol Int,24:1213-1229。[CrossRef],[PubMed],[Web [科学®]查看所有参考文献。医学主题词库对时间生物学参考文献的电子索引和检索的一致性和准确性。Chronobiol Int。24:1213-1229)表明现有的时间生物学MeSH术语所获得的结果不一致且不准确,并建议在MeSH同义词库中包含一些常见的年代生物学概念和定义。从MEDLINE®数据库中下载了219个最近的年代生物学参考样本集,以及与之相关的所有MeSH条目。重新分析了以下明显的年代生物学相关性:“年代生物学”,“年代生物学疾病”,“生物钟”,“昼夜节律”,“年代疗法”,“年代疗法”。 “周期性”,“季节”,“睡眠障碍,昼夜节律”和“时间因素”。结果与我们4年前所做的研究相当。 MeSH术语具有明显的时间生物学意义,仍然不一致且不准确地检索了时间生物学参考资料,而我们建议的通用时间生物学概念均未包含在MeSH同义词库中,但对于时间生物学用途而言仍不完整。查看全文下载全文关键词时间生物学,自动数据处理,medline,医学主题词,国家卫生研究院,国家医学图书馆,结果的可重现性相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook ,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2011.613619

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号