首页> 外文期刊>Biological Engineering >Quantifying Energy Expenditure During Water-Immersion in Non-Trained Cyclists
【24h】

Quantifying Energy Expenditure During Water-Immersion in Non-Trained Cyclists

机译:量化未经训练的骑自行车者在水中的能量消耗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This research project was designed to compare energy expenditures during water-immersion and ambient-air states at three external work rates of 50, 100, and 150 W. Eleven participants were tested on two separate occasions on a bicycle ergometer in water-immersion and ambient-air environments for 3 to 4 min at 50 rpm. Oxygen consumptions and heart rates were monitored continuously throughout both sessions. Perceived exertion was assessed at each work rate during the final 30 s of the sampling period. Water-immersion produced higher oxygen consumption values (2.21 ± 0.20 vs. 1.00 ± 0.14 L min -1 at 50 W; 2.64 ± 0.33 vs. 1.45 ± 0.12 L min -1 at 100 W; and 2.86 ± 0.41 vs. 2.00 ± 0.16 L min -1 at 150 W). Heart rates were greater in water (142.70 vs. 97.90 at 50 W; 152.73 vs. 113.14 at 100 W; and 163.82 vs. 135.09 at 150 W). Perceived exertion scores were higher in water (11.7 vs. 8.5 at 50 W; 15.0 vs. 10.6 at 100 W and 17.2 vs. 12.7 at 150 W). Energy expenditure rates were greater in the water-immersion environment (769 vs. 348 W at 50 W; 919 vs. 505 W at 100 W; 995 vs. 696 W at 150 W). It was concluded that at a constant external load, water-immersion produces greater oxygen consumption and heart rate responses compared to values assessed in an ambient-air state. This difference reflects the external load required to move the viscous liquid instead of air
机译:该研究项目旨在比较在50、100和150 W的三种外部工作速率下在水浸和环境空气状态下的能量消耗。在水浸和环境下的自行车测功机上分别对11位参与者进行了两次测试空气环境,以50 rpm的转速运行3-4分钟。在两个疗程中持续监测氧气消耗和心率。在采样周期的最后30秒内,以每个工作速率评估感知的劳累力。水浸在50 W时产生更高的耗氧量(2.21±0.20 vs. 1.00±0.14 L min -1 ; 2.64±0.33 vs. 1.45±0.12 L min -1 在100 W时;和2.86±0.41与2.00±0.16 L min -1 在150 W时)。水中的心率更高(50 W时为142.70 vs.97.90; 100 W时为152.73 vs.113.14; 150 W时为163.82 vs.135.09)。在水中感知的运动得分更高(在50 W时为11.7对8.5;在100 W时为15.0对10.6;在150 W时为17.2对12.7)。在水浸环境中,能源消耗率更高(50 W时769 vs. 348 W; 100 W时919 vs. 505 W; 150 W时995 vs. 696 W)。结论是,在恒定的外部负载下,与在环境空气状态下评估的值相比,水浸会产生更多的氧气消耗和心率响应。这种差异反映了移动粘性液体而不是空气所需的外部负载

著录项

  • 来源
    《Biological Engineering》 |2008年第4期|p.281-289|共9页
  • 作者单位

    William H. Scott, Jr., Faculty Research Assistant, Frank C. Koh, Faculty Research Assistant, and Ken Y.-S. Chiou, Graduate Student, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland;

    Kathryn R. M. Mackey, Graduate Student, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California;

    and Arthur T. Johnson, ASABE Fellow, Professor, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. Corresponding author: Arthur T. Johnson, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Efficiency; Ergometer; Oxygen consumption; Pedaling;

    机译:效率;测力计耗氧量踩踏板;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:31:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号