首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. V. GROKSTER, LTD.: INDUCING INFRINGEMENT AND SECONDARY COPYRIGHT LIABILITY
【24h】

METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. V. GROKSTER, LTD.: INDUCING INFRINGEMENT AND SECONDARY COPYRIGHT LIABILITY

机译:METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC。诉GROKSTER,LTD .:引发侵权和第二版权责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. ends the latest battle in the entertainment industry's running war against online copyright infringement. The Grokster Court established a new theory of copyright liability, one based on inducement of infringement by end users. This new theory significantly alters the legal environment for technologists, who must now consider a new source of indirect copyright liability when designing software. At the same time, Grokster may frustrate copyright owners who will have to satisfy a new and ambiguous indirect infringement standard. This Note considers the effect of the Grokster decision's inducement theory on designers of file-sharing networks and the decision's effects on the staple article of commerce doctrine. Part Ⅰ describes the current state of the technology underlying file-sharing systems. Part Ⅱ provides a legal primer on indirect copyright liability in the file-sharing context. Part Ⅲ describes the Court's holding and rationale in Grokster, and Part Ⅳ interprets that decision and its impact on the future of file sharing.
机译:米高梅影城(MGM Studios Inc.)诉Grokster,Ltd.结束了娱乐业与在线版权侵权之战中的最新战役。格罗斯特法院(Grokster Court)建立了一种新的版权责任理论,该理论基于最终用户诱导侵权行为。这一新理论极大地改变了技术人员的法律环境,他们现在在设计软件时必须考虑间接版权责任的新来源。同时,Grokster可能会让必须满足新的,模棱两可的间接侵权标准的版权所有者感到沮丧。本说明考虑了Grokster决策的诱导理论对文件共享网络设计者的影响以及该决策对商业学说的主要条款的影响。第一部分描述了文件共享系统的技术现状。第二部分提供了文件共享环境下间接版权责任的法律基础。第三部分描述了法院在Grokster中的拥有权和理由,第四部分解释了该判决及其对文件共享未来的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号