...
首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain?: Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension
【24h】

Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain?: Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension

机译:作品进入公共领域时会发生坏事吗?:版权术语扩展的实证检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

According to the current copyright statute, copyrighted works of music, film, and literature will begin to transition into the public domain in 2018. While this will prove a boon for users and creators, it could be disastrous for the owners of these valuable copyrights. Therefore, the next few years will likely witness another round of aggressive lobbying by the film, music, and publishing industries to extend the terms of already-existing works. These industries, and a number of prominent scholars, claim that when works enter the public domain, bad things will happen to them. They worry that works in the public domain will be underused, overused, or tarnished in ways that will undermine the works' economic and cultural value. Although the validity of their assertions turns on empirically testable hypotheses, very little effort has been made to study them. This Article attempts to fill that gap by studying the market for audiobook recordings of bestselling novels, a multi-million dollar industry. Data from this study, which includes a novel human-subjects experiment, suggest that term-extension proponents' claims about the public domain are suspect. Audiobooks made from public domain bestsellers (1913-22) are significantly more available than those made from copyrighted bestsellers (1923-32). In addition, the experimental evidence suggests that professionally made recordings of public domain and copyrighted books are of similar quality. Finally, while a low quality recording seems to lower a listener's valuation of the underlying work, the data do not suggest any correlation between that valuation and the legal status of the underlying work. Accordingly, this research indicates that the significant costs of additional copyright protection for already-existing works may not be justified. These findings will be relevant to the inevitable congressional and judicial debate over copyright term extension in the next few years.
机译:根据当前的版权法规,音乐,电影和文学的受版权保护的作品将于2018年开始向公共领域过渡。尽管这将为用户和创作者带来福音,但对这些有价值的版权拥有者而言可能是灾难性的。因此,未来几年可能会见证电影,音乐和出版业的另一轮积极游说,以扩大已经存在的作品的期限。这些行业以及许多著名学者声称,当作品进入公共领域时,坏事就会发生。他们担心公共领域的作品会被滥用,过度使用或失去光泽,从而破坏作品的经济和文化价值。尽管它们的断言的有效性来自于经验可检验的假设,但很少有人努力研究它们。本文试图通过研究畅销小说(数百万美元的行业)的有声读音唱片市场来填补这一空白。来自这项研究的数据(包括一项新颖的人类受试者实验)表明,术语扩展提议者对公共领域的主张是可疑的。由公共领域的畅销书(1913-22)制作的有声读物比由受版权保护的畅销书(1923-32)制作的有声读物的可用性要高得多。另外,实验证据表明,专业制作的公共领域和受版权保护的书籍的录音质量相似。最后,虽然低质量的录音似乎降低了听众对基础作品的评估,但数据并未表明该评估与基础作品的法律地位之间存在任何关联。因此,这项研究表明,为现有作品提供额外版权保护的巨额成本可能没有道理。这些发现将与未来几年有关版权期限延长的不可避免的国会和司法辩论有关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Berkeley technology law journal 》 |2013年第1期| 1-43| 共43页
  • 作者单位

    Chicago-Kent College of Law Center for Empirical Studies of Intellectual Property;

    University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Centre for Intellectual Property Policy and Management, Bournemouth University (UK);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号