...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavior Research Methods >Using the Rasch model to quantify the causal effect of test instructions
【24h】

Using the Rasch model to quantify the causal effect of test instructions

机译:使用Rasch模型量化测试指令的因果效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This experimental study was designed to quantify, by means of the Rasch model (RM), the effects of three instruction/ scoring conditions on student measures and on the reliability of an achievement multiple-choice test in a field context. Examinees performed the test in one of three conditions which differed only in the instructions provided. Predictions regarding performance indicators were fulfilled, and the expected differences in reliability favoring omission-inducing instructions did appear. This difference in reliability was found for both Rasch and raw data and thus it can be concluded that the fact that results from previous studies failed to corroborate this prediction must have been due to the lack of important consequences of test scores for the students. The RM has served to neatly quantify the differences between instructions promoting guessing and instructions promoting omission under uncertainty, showing that the recommendation to omit is not only educationally but also psychometrically sound.
机译:这项实验研究旨在通过Rasch模型(RM)量化三种指导/评分条件对学生测评的影响以及对现场多项选择测验的可靠性的影响。考生在仅提供的说明有所不同的三个条件之一中进行了测试。满足了有关性能指标的预测,并且确实出现了有利于省略指示的预期可靠性差异。在Rasch和原始数据中都发现了可靠性的差异,因此可以得出结论,以前的研究结果未能证实该预测的事实一定是由于缺乏考试成绩对学生的重要影响。 RM可以整齐地量化不确定情况下促进猜测的指令和促进遗漏的指令之间的差异,这表明遗漏的建议不仅具有教育意义,而且在心理上也很合理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavior Research Methods》 |2007年第3期|570-573|共4页
  • 作者

    Ana R. Delgado;

  • 作者单位

    Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号