...
首页> 外文期刊>B to B >Paid content proponents charge ahead
【24h】

Paid content proponents charge ahead

机译:付费内容支持者要提前付费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

NYTimes.com, after a decade as a free site, announced May 16 that it would begin charging an annual fee for access to some content, including its op-ed columnists. On the same day, CNN.com announced that it would stop charging a fee to access its online video content, beginning June 20. So which is it? Will news content be free online or will it require an access fee? The short answer, industry observers say, is that must-have, valuable content will command a fee and commoditized content will not. "I think unique, differentiated, proprietary business content has clear value," said. Gordon Crovitz, senior VP of Dow Jones & Co. and president of its electronic publishing group, which charges an annual subscription to The Wall Street Journal Online. On the other hand, Charlie Till-inghast, general manager-publisher of MSNBC.com, said, "It is our view in general that news content will be advertiser-supported and will not be for-pay-type content."
机译:作为免费网站已有10年的历史,NYTimes.com宣布将于5月16日开始收取访问某些内容的年费,包括其专栏作家。当天,CNN.com宣布将从6月20日开始停止收取访问其在线视频内容的费用。那是什么?新闻内容可以在线免费获得还是需要付费?行业观察家说,简短的答案是,必备的有价值的内容将收取费用,而商品化的内容则不会。他说:“我认为独特,有区别的专有业务内容具有明显的价值。”道琼斯公司高级副总裁兼电子出版集团总裁戈登·克罗维兹(Gordon Crovitz)每年订阅《华尔街日报在线》。另一方面,MSNBC.com的总经理兼发行人Charlie Till-inghast表示:“我们一般认为新闻内容将受到广告客户的支持,而不是付费形式的内容。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号