首页> 外文期刊>Axiomathes >Eternalist Theories of Persistence Through Time: Where the Differences Really Lie
【24h】

Eternalist Theories of Persistence Through Time: Where the Differences Really Lie

机译:永恒的永恒的持久性理论:差异真正存在的地方

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The eternalist endurantist and perdurantist theories of persistence through time come in various versions, namely the two versions of perdurantism: the worm view and the stage view, and the two versions of endurantism: indexicalism and adverbialism. Using as a starting point the instructive case of what is depicted by photographs, I will examine these four views, and compare them, with some interesting results. Notably, we will see that two traditional enemies—the perdurantist worm view and the endurantist theories—are more like allies: they are much less different than what is usually thought, and some alleged points of central disagreement fall prey to closer scrutiny. The aim of this paper is to examine carefully all those points, and to call attention to the places where the real differences between these views lie. I will then turn to the perdurantist stage view, and claim that with respect to some central issues it is the view that is the most different from the other three, but that in some places the reason why it different is also the reason why it is less satisfactory.
机译:永恒的持久主义和持久主义关于时间的持久性理论有不同的版本,即持久主义的两个版本:蠕虫观和舞台观,以及持久主义的两个版本:索引主义和副词主义。我将以照片所描绘的情况为出发点,来研究这四种观点,并将它们进行比较,并得出一些有趣的结果。值得注意的是,我们将看到两个传统的敌人-顽固主义蠕虫观点和耐力主义理论-更像盟友:它们与通常所认为的相差无几,而且一些所谓的中央分歧的观点更容易受到更严格的审查。本文的目的是仔细检查所有这些点,并引起人们对这些观点之间真正差异所在的关注。然后,我将转向perperrantist阶段的观点,并声称就某些核心问题而言,它是与其他三个问题最不相同的观点,但在某些地方,它与众不同的原因也是它与众不同的原因。不太令人满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号