首页> 外文期刊>Aviation security international >CIVIL LIBERTIES & AVIATION SECURITY: A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS?
【24h】

CIVIL LIBERTIES & AVIATION SECURITY: A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS?

机译:民用自由与航空安全:术语矛盾吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On the one hand, states have a duty to maintain a high level of security, to adopt measures protecting persons, aircraft, airport facilities and other assets from harm. On the other hand, there are various instruments aimed at protecting human rights, and states are obliged to promote, respect, protect and fulfil them. Balancing or Proportionality Test? A common suggestion is to find a balance between liberty and security values. In other words, we should use the so-called 'trade-off model'. In short, it is not possible to place greater emphasis on one of the values without detracting from the other.
机译:一方面,国家有责任维持高度的安全,采取措施保护人员,飞机,机场设施和其他资产不受伤害。另一方面,有各种旨在保护人权的文书,国家有义务促进,尊重,保护和实现人权。平衡或比例测试?常见的建议是在自由和安全价值之间找到平衡。换句话说,我们应该使用所谓的“权衡模型”。简而言之,不可能在不损害另一个价值的情况下更加强调其中一个价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号