...
【24h】

Potpourri

机译:花香

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A few comments regarding reader feedback ("Unicom") in your September issue: Jim Piper's explanation of O2 partial pressure changing "only slightly" with density altitude is a little misleading. The partial pressure of oxygen is exactly 21 percent of the density altitude air pressure. For example, the absolute air pressure at 10,000-feet density altitude is 21.145 in. Hg; the partial pressure of oxygen is 4.44 in., or 74 percent ofPPO2 at sea level. A 26 percent decrease in available oxygen has my attention. Morris Holmes' comments are more troubling. In another life, when I regularly flew in a MOA, we were not looking for LBFs (little bitty, etc.). We were working hard learning new combat maneuvers or practicing old ones, at high Gs and often at high Mach numbers. If you were to fly a PC-12 through a hot MOA like that every day at 12,000 to 18,000 feet, you would be dead within a year. You would have had the right to be there, but you would still be dead.
机译:关于您9月份的读者反馈(“ Unicom”)的一些评论:Jim Piper对O2分压随密度高度“仅略有变化”的解释有点误导。氧气的分压正好是密度高度气压的21%。例如,在10,000英尺密度高度处的绝对气压为21.145英寸汞柱;氧气的分压为4.44英寸,或在海平面上占PPO2的74%。我关注的是可用氧气减少了26%。莫里斯·福尔摩斯的评论更加令人不安。在另一种生活中,当我定期乘坐MOA飞行时,我们并不是在寻找LBF(小叮咬等)。我们正在努力学习高Gs且经常以高Mach数学习新的战斗动作或练习旧的战斗动作。如果您每天要在12,000到18,000英尺的高度上通过热MOA驾驶PC-12,那么一年之内就会丧命。您本来有权在那里,但您仍然会死。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号