首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journalism Review >A social history of precarity in journalism: Penny-a-liners, Bohemians and larrikins
【24h】

A social history of precarity in journalism: Penny-a-liners, Bohemians and larrikins

机译:新闻的社会历史:Penny-a-insers,波希米亚人和Larrikins

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past decade, journalism scholars have started to pay more attention to what we could call the precarization of journalism: the large-scale job loss and downsizing in the news industry (at least in some countries) combined with a shift towards per-item payment and production rather than permanent, full-time contracts. In this essay, I sketch a history of precarious work in journalism and argue that unionization and other forms of collective action in journalism has been made difficult due to an occupational culture rooted in this history of journalism as precarious work. In the late nineteenth century, journalists in many countries opted to create a culture rather than to create unions, and this culture has both mythologized and naturalized precarity. In Australia, however, journalists unionized early. Besides the obvious structural factors behind this early unionization, the existence of the cultural figure of the larrikin and its role in journalistic culture likely also encouraged taking on a worker identity rather than seeking to emulate an upper-class writerly culture.
机译:在过去的十年中,新闻学者已经开始更加关注我们可以称之为新闻的预测:新闻行业的大规模失业和缩小规模(至少在一些国家)结合每件商品的转变付款和生产而非永久性全职合同。在这篇文章中,我在新闻中绘制了一项不稳定的工作历史,并认为,由于扎根于这一新闻史作为岌岌可危的工作,因此,由于职业文化而难以使联盟和其他形式的集体行动。在十九世纪末,许多国家的记者选择了创造文化而不是创造工会,这种文化都有神话和归化的必然性。但是,在澳大利亚,记者提前化。除了这种早期工联结后面的明显结构因素,洛杉矶文化人物的存在及其在新闻文化中的作用也可能促进了工人身份,而不是寻求模仿上流阶层作家文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号