首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Public Administration >Towards a Model Public Sector Integrity Commission
【24h】

Towards a Model Public Sector Integrity Commission

机译:建立一个模范的公共部门诚信委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the current debate in Australia about public sector integrity and the idea of a standing anticorruption commission. From this debate the article outlines a specific type of ‘public sector integrity commission’ that in principle should have the necessary powers and techniques at its disposal to minimise corruption while ensuring efficiency and fairness. The debate has been most active in jurisdictions that have not had an anticorruption commission – mainly in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania – but debate about integrity commissions has occurred in all jurisdictions. The authors argue that anticorruption commissions are essential to ensure the integrity of the public sector and that a model commission should: cover all elements of the public sector; independently investigate serious and mid-level complaints; have own motion powers to investigate any matter; have summary authority to apply administrative sanctions; make use of a range of investigative tools; not be tasked with combating major and organised crime; and be held accountable to citizens through a parliamentary committee and a parliamentary inspector.
机译:本文探讨了澳大利亚当前有关公共部门诚信和常设反腐败委员会的想法的辩论。本文从这场辩论中概述了一种特殊类型的“公共部门诚信委员会”,该委员会原则上应具备必要的权力和技巧,以最大程度地减少腐败,同时确保效率和公平。在没有反腐败委员会的司法管辖区(主要在维多利亚州,南澳大利亚州和塔斯马尼亚州),辩论一直最为活跃,但是在所有司法管辖区都发生过关于廉政委员会的辩论。作者认为,反腐败委员会对于确保公共部门的完整性至关重要,而示范委员会应:覆盖公共部门的所有要素;独立调查严重和中级投诉;具有调查任何事情的动议权;拥有执行行政制裁的简易权力;利用各种调查工具;没有承担打击重大和有组织犯罪的任务;并通过议会委员会和议会检查员对公民负责。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号