首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Public Administration >Delivery of Public Services by Non-Government Organisations (非营利组织的公共服务提供)?
【24h】

Delivery of Public Services by Non-Government Organisations (非营利组织的公共服务提供)?

机译:Delivery of Public Services by Non-Government Organisations (非营利组织的公共服务提供)?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All levels of government in Australia (national, state and territory, municipal) are increasingly contracting with charitable and other not-for-profit organisations (and, at times, for-profit businesses) for the delivery of public services. While estimates vary about the extent of such arrangements, recent statistics suggest they are a large and growing phenomena. The shift to ‘purchase of service’ contracting and other forms of ‘managed markets’ has been partly motivated by a desire to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery. However, there are some criticisms of the approach, arguing that it leads to a range of problems for not-for-profit organisations, including being burdened by excessive regulation, movement away from their core purpose (so-called ‘mission drift’), and a weakening of the connections with the community they serve. This article examines the prevalence of the contracting arrangements and some of the main reasons why they have come about. It also considers the main gains and challenges resulting from such arrangements, in particular for public sector management. The article draws on recent work by the Productivity Commission (‘the Commission’) including the 2010 study of the contribution of the not-for-profit sector (PC 2010); the 2011 inquiry on disability care and support (PC 2011a); and the 2011 inquiry on caring for older Australians (PC 2011b). It also draws more broadly on a range of other Commission work, including recent reports on government services produced for the Council of Australian Governments (SCRGSP 2011a, 2011b).
机译:澳大利亚各级政府(国家,州和领地,市政府)越来越多地与慈善组织和其他非营利组织(有时甚至是营利性企业)签约,以提供公共服务。尽管对此类安排的程度的估计有所不同,但最近的统计数据表明,这是一个巨大且正在增长的现象。向“购买服务”签约和其他形式的“托管市场”的转变部分是出于对提高服务交付效率和有效性的渴望。但是,这种方法遭到了一些批评,认为这种方法给非营利组织带来了一系列问题,包括受到过度监管的负担,偏离其核心目的(所谓的“任务漂移”),以及与他们所服务的社区之间的联系减弱。本文研究了合同安排的普遍性以及它们产生的一些主要原因。它还考虑了这种安排带来的主要收益和挑战,特别是在公共部门管理方面。本文借鉴了生产力委员会(“生产力委员会”)的最新工作,其中包括2010年对非营利部门贡献的研究(PC 2010); 2011年关于残疾护理和支持的调查(PC 2011a); 2011年有关照顾澳大利亚老年人的询问(PC 2011b)。它还更广泛地利用了委员会的其他工作,包括最近为澳大利亚政府委员会提供的有关政府服务的报告(SCRGSP 2011a,2011b)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号