首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Psychology >Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: What shapes rule-following in a period of transition?
【24h】

Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: What shapes rule-following in a period of transition?

机译:程序正义,同一性和对法律的尊重:过渡时期遵循规则的情况如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The group engagement model has two core arguments. The first is that procedural justice shapes rule-following in groups, organisations and societies. The second is that the influence of procedural justice upon rule-following is mediated by changes in people's identification with groups. This study uses a sample of South Africans to test both arguments. While the procedural justice argument has already been widely tested and supported, this study extends that test to a society in rapid transition and upheaval. Further, it tests the identity mediation argument in the same context. The results support both arguments. Procedural justice shapes rule-following and that influence is mediated by identification with superordinate authority.
机译:团体参与模型有两个核心论点。首先是程序正义塑造了群体,组织和社会中的规则遵循。第二是程序正义对规则遵循的影响是由人们对群体认同的变化所介导的。这项研究使用了南非人的样本来检验这两个论点。尽管程序正义论据已经得到了广泛的检验和支持,但这项研究将检验标准扩展到了一个快速过渡和剧变的社会。此外,它在同一上下文中测试身份中介参数。结果支持两个参数。程序正义决定着规则的遵循,而这种影响是通过与上级权威的认同来调节的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号