Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia

Gary Edmond

首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences >Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia

【24h】

Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia

机译：公正，效率或可靠性？对澳大利亚专家证据法和程序的批评

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This Article does not have an abstract.

机译：本文没有摘要。

著录项

来源
《Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences》 |2010年第2期|83-99|共17页
作者
Gary Edmond;
展开▼
作者单位

Program in Expertise, Evidence & Law, Faculty of Law, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. PLENARY LECTURE Impartiality, efficiency or'-reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia [J] . Gary Edmond The Australian journal of forensic sciences . 2010,第2期

机译：全体会议公正，效率或可靠性？对澳大利亚专家证据法律和程序的重要回应
2. Evaluating the Reliability of Expert Evidence in Compensation Procedures: Are Diagnosticians Influenced by the Narrative Fallacy when Assessing the Psychological Injuries of Trauma Victims? [J] . M. J. J. Kunst, M. Van de Wiel Psychological injury and law . 2016,第3期

机译：在补偿程序中评估专家证据的可靠性：在评估创伤受害者的心理伤害时，诊断医生是否受叙事谬误的影响？
3. The Reliability of Expert Evidence: Reflections on the Law Commission's Proposals for Reform [J] . Liz Heffernan, Mark Coen The journal of criminal law . 2009,第6期

机译：专家证据的可靠性：对法律委员会改革建议的思考
4. Ergonomics for Impartiality and Efficiency in the Law-Courts of Ancient Athens [C] . Vassilis Papakostopoulos, Dimitris Nathanael, Nicolas Marmaras International Ergonomics Association, Congress . 2019

机译：古代雅典法律法规的符合人体工程学和效率
5. The "Safe Third Country" Approach vs. the Notion of Non-Refoulement in International Law: A Critical Examination of Australian Law and Policy. [D] . Thapa, Shamser Singh. 2011

机译：“安全第三国”方法与国际法中不驱回的概念：对澳大利亚法律和政策的批判性考察。
6. Evaluating the Reliability of Expert Evidence in Compensation Procedures: Are Diagnosticians Influenced by the Narrative Fallacy when Assessing the Psychological Injuries of Trauma Victims? [O] . M. J. J. Kunst, M. Van de Wiel -1

机译：在赔偿程序中评估专家证据的可靠性：在评估创伤受害者的心理伤害时诊断医生是否受到叙事谬误的影响？
7. nyk of the Lviv University. Series Law KEYWORDS abuse of authority, abuse of power, abuse of official status, abuse of office acts of the European Union, international legal regulation, employment, right to free movement advocacy, advocate activity, advocacy science, advocatologie, theory of advocacy appeal proceeding, grounds to judgement revision, inconsistency of the court’s findings at first instance with the actual circumstances of the criminal proceedings, cancellation or alteration of the judgment charity organization, founder, assets of charity organization, constituent documents criminal proceedings, subjects of criminal proceedings, the suspect, the suspect law, criminal procedure, international standards employer’s duty, right to the moral injury compensation, social insurance from an industrial accident, social need, labour dispute forms of the legal actions of the collective of employees historical and legal science department, scientific activity law enforcement equipment, individual legal act, the means of forming the content of the enforcement act, requirements for registration of individual legal act attributes (properties) of acts of law legal formula (construction), qualified corpus delicti of a crime, degree of social danger, crime-forming feature legal social community legal technique, technology, legal act, legal system, lawmaking legitimacy, investigation of crime, concept of criminalistics, criminalistics recommendations, tactical methods measures aimed at providing criminal proceedings, procedural sanction, monetary penalty, pre-trial investigation national implementation, forms of implementation, implementation practice, European states, international treaties participant, shareholder, partnership, acquisition, changing, suspension proof, probability, likelihood, credibility in evidence, reliability scientific school, research, development land, agricultural and environmental law, Lviv Scientific School land, agricultural and environmental law the High Council of Justice of Ukraine, the National Council of Justice of the Republic of Poland, judges’ independence, international standards of the judiciary the presumption of the labor legal personality OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEMS Journal Help USER Username Password Remember me Login NOTIFICATIONS View Subscribe LANGUAGE Select LanguageSubmit JOURNAL CONTENT Search Search Scope Search Browse By Issue By Author By Title Other Journals FONT SIZE Make font size smallerMake font size defaultMake font size larger INFORMATION For Readers For Authors For Librarians HOME ABOUT LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES ANNOUNCEMENTS Home > No 67 (2018) > Марін ONCE AGAIN ON THE RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF THE CRIMINAL LAW IN TIME IN THE ASPECT OF INDIRECT CRIMINALIZATION [O] . Oleksandr Marin 2018

机译：LVIV大学的尼克。系列律师关键词滥用权威，滥用权力，滥用官方地位，滥用欧盟办公室行为，国际法律监管，就业，自由运动倡导，倡导活动，倡导科学，倡导性宣传理论，倡导呼吁的理论，理由修改，法院调查结果的不一致事实，判决慈善组织的实际情况，取消或改变判决慈善机构，慈善组织的创始人，慈善机构资产，组成文件刑事诉讼，刑事诉讼主题，嫌疑人，嫌疑法，刑事诉讼，国际标准雇主的责任，道德伤害赔偿权，社会保险从工业事故，社会需求，劳动争端形式的员工历史和法律科学部的法律行为，科学活动执法设备，个人法律法案，制定执法法案的内容，法律法律公式（建设）行为的个人法律法案（属性），犯罪的合格犯罪，社会危险程度，犯罪形成特征法律社会社会法律技术，技术，法律法，法律制度，立法合法性，犯罪调查，犯罪概念，犯罪建议，战术方法旨在提供刑事诉讼，程序制裁，货币罚款，预审调查预审国家实施，执行形式，实施实践，欧洲国家，国际条约参与者，股东，伙伴关系，收购，不断变化，暂停证明，概率，可能性，可信度在证据，可靠性科学学校，研究，开发土地，农业和环境法，利沃科学校园，农业和环境法律议理乌克兰的冰，波兰共和国国家司法委员会，法官的独立，国际标准的司法部门劳动法人的推定开放期刊系统期刊帮助用户用户名密码记住我登录通知查看订阅语言选择lobsumberubmit期刊内容搜索搜索范围搜索按问题浏览作者标题在间接刑事定罪方面，再次对刑法的追溯效应及时
8. Evidence of Progress - Measurement of Impacts of Australia's S&L Program from 1990-2010. Conference: 7th nternational Conference on Energy Efficiency in Domestic Appliances and Lighting, Coimbra, Portugal, 9/11/2013. [R] . Lowenthal-Savy, D., McNeil, M., Harrington, L. 2013

机译：进展的证据 - 衡量1990 - 2010年澳大利亚s＆amp; L计划的影响。会议：第7届国际家用电器和照明能源效率国际会议，葡萄牙科英布拉，2013年9月11日。

Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅