首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Environmental Management >The Practice of Mediating Environmental Disputes by the Environment Court in New Zealand
【24h】

The Practice of Mediating Environmental Disputes by the Environment Court in New Zealand

机译:新西兰环境法院调解环境纠纷的做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is growing recognition of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods to resolve environmental conflicts compared to adversarial procedures. The Environment Court in New Zealand (formerly the Planning Tribunal) was given additional powers under the Resource Management Act 1991 to conduct mediation to settle disputes to complement its established role in dispute resolution using formal hearing procedures. This article provides an overview of the processes for conducting mediation under the Resource Management Act 1991 and examines the extent to which Court assisted environmental mediation is undertaken in New Zealand. The effectiveness of processes is evaluated from the perspective of the principal groups of stakeholders, judges, environmental commissioners and participants in Court assisted mediation. The evaluation was based on a range of procedural fairness criteria derived from a literature review. Data were collected from documentary sources and personal in-depth interviews with Environment Court Judges, Commissioners and participants in selected recent mediation cases.
机译:与对抗性程序相比,人们越来越认识到解决环境冲突的替代性争议解决(ADR)方法。 1991年《资源管理法》赋予了新西兰环境法院(原计划法庭)额外的权力,可以进行调解解决争端,以补充其在使用正式听证程序解决争端中的既定作用。本文概述了根据《 1991年资源管理法》进行调解的过程,并研究了在新西兰法院协助环境调解的程度。从利益相关者,法官,环境专员和法院协助调解参与者的主要群体的角度评估程序的有效性。评估基于一系列文献综述得出的程序公正性标准。数据收集自文献资料,并与近期选定的一些调解案件中的环境法院法官,专员和参与者进行了深入访谈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号