首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Earth Sciences: An International Geoscience Journal of the Geological Society of Australia >Evaluating the relative contributions of vegetation and flooding in controlling channel widening: the case of the Nepean River, southeastern Australia
【24h】

Evaluating the relative contributions of vegetation and flooding in controlling channel widening: the case of the Nepean River, southeastern Australia

机译:评价植被和洪水在控制河道拓宽中的相对贡献:以澳大利亚东南部的Nepean河为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many lowland stream channels have dramatically widened over the last two centuries. There has been considerable debate about whether this widening was caused by an unusually large flood, by a series of large floods, or by decreased bank stability caused by clearing of riparian vegetation. The relative effects of floods and vegetation can be disentangled in southeastern Australia where streams have undergone both clearing of bank vegetation, and decadal sequences of relatively higher and lower flood magnitude and frequency. Archival aerial photographs of the Nepean River, in southeastern Australia, suggest that banks did not erode during periods of low flood magnitude (drought-dominated regime: from 1901-1949) whether they were cleared or not. However, during periods of flood-dominated regime (1950 to 1970s) only cleared stream banks eroded. Thus, on the upper Nepean River, clearing alone was insufficient to trigger erosion by small floods, and even large floods were unable to erode vegetated banks. The conclusion is that substantial channel widening in this river required both clearing of bank vegetation, and periods of unusually large and frequent floods. This conclusion is supported by geomechanical modelling that examine the reduction in bank shear strength arising from the loss of tree-root reinforcement. The modelling also suggests that bank instability arising from devegetation amplifies the potential for bank failure during the drawdown phase of a flood, leading to channel widening. View full textDownload full textKey Wordsbank erosion, channel widening, geomechanical modelling, Nepean River, root reinforcement, vegetation clearingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2010.492910
机译:在过去的两个世纪中,许多低地河流渠道大大扩大。关于这种扩展是由异常大洪水,一系列大洪水还是由于清除河岸植被造成的河岸稳定性下降引起的争议很大。在澳大利亚东南部,洪水和植被的相对影响可以被消除,那里的溪流既经历了河岸植被的清除,又经历了洪水幅度和频率相对较高和较低的年代际序列。澳大利亚东南部Nepean河的档案航拍照片表明,无论洪水是否被清除,在洪水泛滥的时期(1902年至1949年干旱时期),它们都没有受到侵蚀。但是,在以洪水为主的政权时期(1950年至1970年代),只有清除的河床才受到侵蚀。因此,在Nepean河上游,仅进行清理尚不足以引发小规模洪水的侵蚀,甚至大洪水也无法侵蚀植被繁茂的河岸。结论是,这条河中的大范围河道拓宽既需要清除河岸植被,又需要异常大而频繁的洪水。该结论得到地质力学模型的支持,该模型研究了由于树根钢筋损失而引起的堤岸抗剪强度的降低。该模型还表明,由于植被泛滥而引起的堤岸不稳定性会放大洪水降落阶段堤岸失灵的可能性,从而导致河道拓宽。查看全文下载全文关键词词库侵蚀,渠道拓宽,地质力学建模,Nepean河,根部加固,植被清除facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2010.492910

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号