...
【24h】

Statutory damages in copyright

机译:法定损害赔偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is growing pressure around the world for countries to introduce statutory damages in copyright. By calculating damages with reference to the extent of the infringement rather than the extent of the loss suffered, these systems aim to compensate plaintiffs even where actual loss is difficult to prove, and to punish and discourage copyright infringement. However, the experience of the United States in particular raises doubts over the desirability of these schemes. This article examines the development of and theory behind statutory damages, drawing a contrast with the current Australian system, to reach two main conclusions: that the most appropriate role for damages in copyright is compensatory; and that our current system is more suited to this role than any of the proposed models of statutory damages.
机译:在世界范围内,越来越大的压力要求各国引入版权的法定赔偿。通过参考侵权程度而不是损失的程度来计算损害赔偿,这些系统旨在补偿原告,即使在实际损失难以证明的情况下,也可以惩罚和劝阻版权侵权。但是,美国的经验尤其使人们对这些计划的可取性产生怀疑。本文研究了法定损害赔偿的发展和背后的理论,并与现行的澳大利亚制度进行了对比,得出两个主要结论:损害赔偿在版权中最适当的作用是补偿性;而且我们目前的系统比任何提议的法定损害赔偿模式都更适合担任此职务。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Australian intellectual property journal 》 |2010年第4期| p.219-239| 共21页
  • 作者

    Andrew Trotter;

  • 作者单位

    LLB student, Queensland University of Technology. I would like to thank Associate Lecturer Nicolas Suzor, whose guidance has been indispensible in the preparation of this paper. All errors and omissions are my own;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号