...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Environment Review >Case note: Forrest & Forrest Pty Ltd v Wilson
【24h】

Case note: Forrest & Forrest Pty Ltd v Wilson

机译:案例记录:Forrest&Forrest Pty Ltd诉Wilson

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The High Court's decision emphasises that ss 74, 74A and 75 of the Act set out steps in a sequential process that must be complied with for the valid exercise of the Minister's power to make a grant, and that any deviation from that sequential process will lead to the invalidity of a mining lease subsequently granted. Accordingly, prospective applicants for a mining lease should ensure strict compliance with the regime as it now stands, whilst current applicants for, and holders of, mining leases should confirm that the documents required by s 74(l)(ca)(ii) of the Act were lodged with the relevant application, and not subsequently.
机译:高等法院的裁决强调,该法令第74、74A和75条规定了相继程序中的步骤,为了有效行使部长的授予权力,必须遵循该程序,并且与该相继程序的任何偏离都将导致随后授予的采矿租约无效。因此,采矿租约的准申请人应确保严格遵守目前的制度,而采矿租约的当前申请人和持有人应确认第74(l)(ca)(ii)条要求的文件该法案已提交相关申请,但随后没有提出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号