首页> 外文期刊>Australian Electronics Engineering >Analogue circuit design for RF immunity
【24h】

Analogue circuit design for RF immunity

机译:模拟电路设计抗射频干扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why Bother with immunity design? The answer is because most analogue ICs are susceptible to demodulating radio frequency (RF) signals which are outside their linear frequency range of operation. Unfortunately, there are no data sheet specifications which can act as a predictor for this problem. As a general rule, bipolar op-amps are approximately 20dB less immune than BiFET types. Even "slow" op-amps are sensitive to RF interference on all their pins, regardless of the feedback schemes employed. (See Fig. 1.) All semiconductors demodulate RF signals due to inherent non-linear characteristics. Demodulation is a very common problem in analogue circuits, because they do not have noise thresholds like digital circuits. Contrary to what most low-frequency analogue designers believe, even "slow" op-amps will happily demodulate inter- ference up to cellphone frequencies and beyond, as shown by the real product test results of figure 2 (note that the output error is worse at 1 GHz than at 500MHz). (For more on this issue, read section 4.3.2 of reference 2.)
机译:为什么要打扰免疫设计?答案是因为大多数模拟IC容易解调超出其线性工作频率范围的射频(RF)信号。不幸的是,没有数据表规范可以作为此问题的预测指标。通常,双极性运算放大器的抗扰度比BiFET类型小20dB。即使采用“慢速”运算放大器,其所有引脚上的RF干扰也很敏感,无论采用何种反馈方案。 (见图1。)由于固有的非线性特性,所有半导体都对RF信号进行解调。解调是模拟电路中非常普遍的问题,因为它们不像数字电路那样具有噪声阈值。与大多数低频模拟设计师的看法相反,即使是“慢速”运算放大器也可以愉快地解调高达手机频率及更高频率的干扰,如图2的实际产品测试结果所示(请注意,输出误差更严重)在1 GHz时比在500MHz时)。 (有关此问题的更多信息,请参阅参考2的4.3.2节。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号